Showcasing Boston’s Civic Tech Tools at #Tech4Democracy

The team at the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, an NCDD member organization, recently posted on their Challenges to Democracy blog about their #Tech4Democracy Showcase and Challenge – an event highlighting civic tech projects from the Boston area. It featured some very cool civic tech tools that could be useful for folks in our field, so we encourage you to read more in the post below or find the original here.


HUBweek Event Shows Greater Boston is Ripe with Civic Tech

Ash logoThe Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation is a leading research center at the Harvard Kennedy School focused on the intersection of government and technology. We are helping HKS students – our future public leaders – to learn crucial technology skills that they will take with them into their careers. The Center is also studying unanswered questions about the potential and the pitfalls of technology’s role in making government more modern, effective, and efficient as well as more responsive, transparent, and participatory.

A strong connection to real-world practice is an important element in most of our research, teaching, and outreach efforts. On October 9, 2015, the Ash Center hosted #Tech4Democracy Showcase and Challenge, welcoming over 350 people to the JFK Jr. Forum.

The #Tech4Democracy Showcase and Challenge was a festive gathering for the local civic tech community and anyone with an interest in learning more about how technology can benefit the civic health, public services, and political life in their communities. No matter your background, the event was an opportunity to share your ideas, join in conversation, or simply browse.

#Tech4Democracy featured 28 projects that have been dreamt up, designed, developed, and created by people with a connection to Greater Boston. They tackle issues from participation and engagement to voting and elections. There are ideas for recruiting more citizens to run for elected office and others for improving the communication between current elected officials and their constituents. There are also platforms that aim to help people connect to one another – both for the purpose of political organizing around shared interests and taking action together on public problems.

While #Tech4Democracy was not a hackathon, it was social. Celebratory, even, with a DJ, good food, beer and wine. Everyone in attendance was invited to vote for their favorite among 28 different teams competing to take home a $5,000 ‘People’s Choice’ award.

ballot box

Meanwhile, a $5,000 ‘Judge’s Choice’ award was selected by an esteemed panel of judges comprised of Professor Eric Gordon of Emerson College, Scott McFadden of Microsoft, Jane Wiseman of the Institute for Excellence in Government, and Perry Hewitt, Chief Digital Officer for Harvard University. Their job was not an easy one!

The winner of the Judge’s Choice Award was Agora, an online civic network dedicated to purpose-driven dialogue between decision makers and busy people concerned about their  communities.

Runner up in the Judge’s Choice Award was CandiDating, a platform to match potential voters with political candidates based on their views.

The winner of the People’s Choice Award was DoneGood, an app that makes it easy to find businesses that share your values by empowering users to “vote with their wallets” to create a financial incentive for more businesses to adopt socially responsible business practices.

Runner up in the People’s Choice Award was MetaCogs, a web-based collaborative space in which communities of learners don’t  just share what they’re thinking, they share how they’re thinking.

archon

There were also 12 local institutions displaying their civic tech work as non-competing exhibitors.  Many thanks to them and our supporters that helped make the event a success: Boston Civic Media Consortium, City of Boston, City of Cambridge, City of Somerville, Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, Engagement Lab at Emerson College, FWD.us, Microsoft, and The Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School.

The Ash Center was delighted to be hosting #Tech4Democracy as part of HUBweek, a joint venture between The Boston Globe, MIT, MGH and Harvard University. The spirit of HUBweek was to provide unique and unexpected experiences that celebrate the world-changing work, art, and thinking being imagined and built in Greater Boston.

#Tech4Democracy was the Ash Center’s contribution toward celebrating and showcasing the growing and vibrant community of students, entrepreneurs, technologists, passionate citizens, and others in the Boston area who are using their creativity and knowledge of digital technology to make our governments run better, engage our communities, and improve our quality of life. More information, including a calendar of past HUBweek events, is available at hubweek.org.

You can find the original version of this Challenges to Democracy blog post at www.challengestodemocracy.us/home/greater-boston-is-ripe-with-civic-tech/#sthash.wE4y4RqZ.PAWn3hGQ.dpuf.

EvDem Campaign Reaches Student Democracy Project in Bolivia

As we work in our own local niches, it’s easy at times to forget that D&D is an international field. But as this recent post from NCDD member organization Everyday Democracy shows, our work continues to impacts and be impacted by a global movement for democracy. This EvDem article shows how ripples their recent social media campaign made it all the way to young people democratizing their student governments in Bolivia. Read more about it below or find the original piece here.


Putting ‘Everyday Democracy’ Into Practice: Making Visions a Reality

EvDem LogoWhen people think of “democracy,” what comes to mind most often is voting. This is certainly an important part of it, but democracy is something we as citizens should be connected to every day.

As an organization, we work to make sure people have opportunities to participate in decision-making at all levels. We believe people should have a voice in what happens in their schools, in their communities, and in their government on a regular basis – not just on Election Day.

This summer to celebrate our Independence Day, we launched a campaign to get people talking about what democracy means to them. People from all over the country contributed their ideas, which ranged from “transparency” to “participation” to “sharing responsibility for the outcomes of government,” and more.

Not only did this campaign draw responses from people all over the U.S., it also caught the attention of Adam Conkright, co-founder of Democracy In Practice, a nonprofit organization based in Cochabamba, Bolivia, dedicated to democratic innovation, experimentation, and capacity building.

“What stood out to us,” Adam explains, “is that several people in the campaign expressed the idea that democracy can be done better, and that improving democracy is like a journey that continues with no real endpoint.” He says this theme really connected with them because that is what Democracy In Practice is all about. “We are trying to help strengthen this growing global movement to improve democracy, and we think the most important thing is for people to start experimenting with different approaches, not only in governments but also in schools, community associations, unions, nonprofits, worker cooperatives, and the like. We’re trying to get people to think outside the box and get creative.”

They’re hoping to inspire others in this way by setting an innovative example themselves. For the past couple years, Democracy In Practice has been working in schools in Bolivia helping students reinvent student government. Adam sees schools as a really great place for this type of experimentation because “the stakes are so low that students can completely redesign their government – each semester if they want to – in ways that would be too risky elsewhere.” He also points out that this kind of experimentation has the added benefit of encouraging students to be engaged and to think critically and creatively about improving their school community.

It’s in this innovative atmosphere that students have replaced elections with random lotteries, rotated meeting roles, and tested out both mandatory and voluntary participation. These and other changes have had an effect: the student government at one school has started the school’s first library, issued its first ID cards to halve student transportation costs, and exposed one teacher’s abuse of power. All the while, the Democracy In Practice team provides suggestions, support, and capacity building to go along with support from school staff. It’s a continual process of trying to make student government more inclusive, representative, and effective in a variety of contexts. A journey with no endpoint.

Bolivians celebrate their independence on August 6th, and inspired by our campaign Democracy In Practice asked these student governments what democracy meant to them. As Adam explained, the students added their own twist. “Just like in the US, people here in Bolivia come from a variety of different backgrounds and have very different views, but each student government decided to deliberate and agree upon a collective answer to the question.” Not surprisingly, the responses of both groups stressed unity.

Group of young students holding a sign that says "Democracy is participation, working together, and the community united."

The 4th-8th grade student government members at the rural school where Democracy In Practice is working decided that “Democracy is participation, working together, and the community united.”

Group of high school students holding a sign that says, "Democracy means working as a team to defend the rights of everyone - unity is strength.”

The other school Democracy In Practice is working in is an urban night high school with much older students. The student government there agreed that “Democracy means working as a team to defend the rights of everyone – unity is strength.”

Adam feels that the next step for Democracy In Practice in this journey is to look beyond schools to find a union or community organization that is open to experimenting in this manner. “People in your campaign said that democracy means ‘participation’,  ‘equality’, ‘transparency’, etc.,” he noted. “If we want government to actually embody those beautiful ideals then we’ve all got to roll up our sleeves and develop better ways to govern ourselves. We liked that your campaign encouraged people to think critically, and we appreciate that Everyday Democracy’s work takes an innovative approach to bringing communities together. Hopefully together we can get more people thinking creatively about what democracy means and what it’s going to take to make those visions a reality.”

We have a lot we can learn from each other, whether it’s from our neighbor next door or our friends in a different hemisphere. In fact, the only way we can continue to build a democracy that works for everyone is to continuously examine and improve our current systems, learn from the experiences of others as well as our own, and make sure everyone has a chance to participate.

You can find the original version of this Everyday Democracy post at www.everyday-democracy.org/news/putting-everyday-democracy-practice-making-visions-reality.

Akron Millennials’ Advice on Engaging Youth in Civic Life

Engaging young people is often something that many in our field know we need to do, but aren’t sure how. So we wanted to share a recent post from the team at the Jefferson Center, an NCDD member organization, in which they share recommendations from Millennials about how local governments can increase young people’s participation. It comes as part of a broader project on engaging Millennials, and we encourage you to read more in the Jefferson Center post below or to find the original here.


JeffersonCenterLogoYoung People Don’t Vote

Young people don’t vote. Millennial turnout at the polls is dismal, especially for local and off-year elections. To be fair, young people have never turned out at the rate of older Americans. But even the turnout gains seen during President Obama’s election in 2008 have eroded, and quickly.

By their own admission, many young voters lack critical information about the relationship between government and the issues they care about most. Many distrust politicians and ignore the majority of candidates who fail to address their priority issues. Many feel government can’t solve the problems they see as most pressing.

We know, however, that young Americans care deeply about their communities, participating in volunteer and service activities at greater rates than older generations. What we don’t know, at least not yet, is how we can leverage that enthusiasm for community and country into more active participation in our democratic political system.

To begin answering that question, we’re exploring Millennial engagement in local elections and civic life with a pilot project in Akron, OH funded by the Knight Foundation. We’re working with major media outlets and student journalists to dive into Millennial perceptions of local government, local politics, and the role they see for themselves in local civic life as they negotiate student debt, underemployment, and more. You can read the first two articles from student journalists online in the Youngstown Vindicator, outlining Millennial priorities, and the Akron Beacon Journal, highlighting young people’s perspective on electoral politics.

We’ve also asked Akron’s Millennials to consider how we might stoke their participation in local civic life and politics more broadly. Their recommendations expressed a desire for a stronger participatory role for young people to help shape their community and their collective future

1. Educate young people about local government and their community.

  • Hire city staff whose principal responsibility is public and youth engagement.
  • Expand volunteer, internship, and mentoring opportunities for students within city government and community organizations.
  • Host mock City Councils in area schools that focus on city issues.

2. Improve City of Akron’s online presence.

  • Web interface encourages active conversation, presents a transparent budget and legislation in clear, accessible language, and highlights opportunities for direct participation.
  • Develop a City of Akron app that includes information about voting, updates on important city information, and reminders of community projects and events.

3. Create opportunities for young people to tangibly impact decision making.

  • Regularly host diverse youth “think tanks” with residents from around Akron to learn about issues and provide input for the City on appropriate courses of action.
  • Allocate a portion of the city budget for projects designed and voted on by young people (participatory budgeting).

We’re committed to working with Akron’s new mayor-elect and City Council to implement these recommendations and provide more support for youth engagement in politics. We’ll continue to share updates as we move forward.

You can find the original version of this Jefferson Center post at www.jefferson-center.org/u4d-akron.

4th Int’l Conference on PB in N. America Opens Call for Proposals

Before you check out for the holiday this week, we encourage our members to consider responding to the call for proposals for the 4th International Conference on Participatory Budgeting in North America, which will be hosted in Boston, MA from May 20th – 22nd, 2016 by the Participatory Budgeting Project, one of our great NCDD member organizations.

The deadline to submit for the conference is December 18th, 2015, so don’t wait too long! You can read the full call for proposals here.

This year’s conference will coincide with the voting phase of the Boston’s youth participatory budgeting process, which adds an exciting focus on young people’s participation in deliberative processes to the gathering. Here is how PBP describes the conference:

The 4th International Conference on Participatory Budgeting in North America, organized by the Participatory Budgeting Project (PBP), will take place in Boston, Massachusetts, USA during the voting phase of their award-winning, city-wide, youth PB process.

The conference is a space for participants and organizers of PB processes to share and reflect on their experiences so far, alongside interested activists, practitioners, scholars, elected officials, and civic designers.

The PB Conference will be organized around three themes this year:

2016 Conference Themes

  • Youth power through PB: PB in schools, youth-only processes, and nearly every other PB process in North America uniquely gives real power to young people – as young as 11! What can we do to encourage even more youth leadership with PB?
  • PB in practice: What is working well? What has been less successful? What improvements can be made in the way the process is implemented? How can we do better and be more effective with existing PB processes and how can we put more processes in place across North America and around the world.
  • Measuring impact: How do we define a good PB process? What are the best ways to define success in this context? What are innovative, effective tools and methods we can use to assess the impact of processes that are currently underway as well as to shape new PB processes.

Any proposals for workshops, presentations, panel discussions or other creative formats focused on one of these three themes will be welcomed for consideration, and you can send in proposals via the submission form at www.pbconference.org/submit. For more information, email PBP at conference@participatorybudgeting.org.

Again, the deadline for submissions is December 18th, so send in your proposals soon! Registration for the conference is slated to open in January, and early registration will end in April. We can’t wait to see how this great gathering turns out!

For more information on the 2016 PB Conference, you can visit www.pbconference.org.

Featured D&D Story: Affording Johnson County

Today we’re pleased to be featuring another example of dialogue and deliberation in action. This mini case study was submitted by NCDD member David Supp-Montgomerie of the University of Iowa’s Program for Public Life via NCDD’s new Dialogue Storytelling Tool. Do you have a dialogue story that our network could learn from? Add your dialogue story today!


ShareYourStory-sidebarimageTitle of Project

Affording Johnson County

Description

Johnson County has the highest portion of residents paying over 50% of their income on housing costs in the entire state of Iowa – and the number for its renters is far higher than the national average. In partnership with several community organizations, this year-long public conversation project began with local discussions in several communities and culminates this April in a County Wide Deliberative Summit.

We have held our first meeting so far and it drew business owners, faith leaders (local churches, the synagogue, and the mosque), elected officials at the state and local level, community organizers, and ordinary folks passionate about the topic. City council members were sitting across from refugees and graduate students – this is what democracy looks like.

Which dialogue and deliberation approaches did you use or borrow heavily from?

  • National Issues Forums
  • Open Space / Unconference
  • World Cafe

What was your role in the project?

Co-Organizer, Primary Facilitator, and Sponsoring Organization

Who were your partners for the project (if any)?

Johnson County Affordable Homes Coalition, PATV Channel 18 (local public access station)

What issues did the project primarily address?

Economic issues

Lessons Learned

Some of the small communities had few traditional aspects of civic infrastructure used to organize an event, but we had success when we recruited several faith leaders to help plan and recruit members to participate.

Where to learn more about the project:

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1623032817948781.1073741828.1608100846108645&type=3

Confab Call Launches Nevins Democracy Leaders Program Partnership – Apply Today!

Wow. Our NCDD team was blown away by the amazing response from the field to the announcement we recently made about the launch of our partnership with the McCourtney Institute for Democracy‘s new Nevins Democracy Leaders Program and the Confab Call we hosted on Wednesday to educate organizational leaders on how they can apply to host a Nevins Fellow. We had nearly 70 registrants for the call, including some of D&D’s leading organizations, and the excitement on the call for what this program can do for the field was palpable.

Mccourtney Institute LogoIn case you didn’t hear about it, this week’s Confab Call featured a presentation from NCDD member John Gastil on the brand new Penn State program that will serve to place D&D-trained students into funded fellowship positions with organizations focused on D&D, transpartisan dialogue, and civic renewal. We had a lively conversation, and John shared tons of helpful info and background about this amazing opportunity to support our field while developing the next generation of its leaders.

If you couldn’t join us for the Confab Call conversation, we strongly encourage you to listen to the recording of the call to learn more about the program and how to apply.

After the call, NCDD Sustaining Member David Nevins – whose gift to the McCourtney Institute has endowed the program – shared some of his reflections on last summer’s pilot fellowships and his excitement about the full launch of the Nevins Democracy Leaders Program:

My vision of the program was very much based on the symbiotic relationship between the Fellow and the organizations that the Fellows engage with…  The letters I received from [last summer’s first two Nevins Fellows] in which they said things like “this summer changed my life” or “thank you for allowing me the opportunity to gain real world experience in deliberative democracy and trans-partisan politics” shows that experiences were rewarding and perhaps even life changing for the interns.

Thus my goal of a relationship equally as valuable to all parties involved seems to have been achieved. I could not ask for more in these early stages of the program, and I am confident that with each additional experience the program will blossom beyond my initial expectations.

We at NCDD share David’s confidence for the future of this great effort and are proud to be part of this transformative work.

If you are in leadership with an organization that would benefit from working with a Nevins Fellow, we encourage you to submit an application today! Please note that for priority consideration in the next round of fellowship matches, you must apply before the end of the day on Monday, November 2nd. Applications received after Nov. 2nd will still be considered, but may be put on the wait list for the next round of fellowship matches. We’ve already received over 20 applications, and competition for fellowship placements is going to be stiff, Confab bubble imageso make sure to apply ASAP!

To learn more about NCDD Confab Calls and find recordings from past presentations, visit www.ncdd.org/events/confabs.

1st Community College Student PB Program Launches in CA

Our friends with the Participatory Budgeting Project – an NCDD member organization – recently announced that Palo Alto College will become the nation’s first community college to open a participatory budgeting process to students in Spring 2016. More young people being exposed to this powerful form of D&D is great news for our field and for the students themselves, and we commend PAC on taking this step!  Learn more in PB’s post below or find the original here.


Participatory Budgeting for Community Colleges – Palo Alto College in San Antonio

We’re excited to share that Palo Alto College, a community college in San Antonio, is expanding its participatory budgeting process. Representatives from Palo Alto came to our conference in 2013 and were so inspired that they started a PB process for faculty and staff – the first at a community college in the US. In 2015, they’re opening the process us to students. With a budget of $25,000, the top projects will come to fruition in Spring 2016.

See below for an update from PAC’s blog on the first community college PB process in the US!

– — –

Palo Alto College students now have the opportunity to propose and vote on how institutional funds are used due to a worldwide project called Participatory Budgeting. Participatory Budgeting is a different way to manage public funds by engaging stakeholders to collaborate and decide how to spend public funds.

“Participatory Budgeting (PB) means a very simple way of showing transparency on how we spend our money, “ said Carmen Velasquez, PAC Participatory Budgeting Core Team Member.

PB started at Palo Alto College in 2013 with groups of faculty and staff. Since then, faculty and staff members have been able to work together to submit project ideas with budgets up to $5,000. Walking around campus, visitors can see the PB process firsthand, such as the Ray Ellison Center bike trail, Palomino Patio near Concho Hall, which were among the handful of projects proposed and voted by faculty and staff.

Now in its fourth cycle, the program has expanded and will now be available for student submissions starting in Fall 2015. A total of $25,000 has been set aside specifically for students to propose and turn ideas into action.

“What we are looking for are projects that benefit the college as a whole,” said Anthony Perez, Participatory Budgeting Core Team Member.

PAC sophomore Robert James Casillas said, “It will be cool to see something on campus and say ‘that was me, my idea or I had a say in that.’”

All PAC students currently enrolled will be allowed to take part in the voting process in the Fall 2015 semester, and the projects with the most votes will be funded and implemented in Spring 2016. However, only student groups and organizations will be able to propose and submit ideas this year.

Currently, Palo Alto College is the only community college in the United States taking part in the Participatory Budgeting process.

“I am really excited to see what the students come up with, I know they are going to be very creative,” said Velasquez.

For more information about Student Participatory Budgeting visit Student Life at Palo Alto College in Student Center Room 124 or call 210-486-3125.

You can find the original version of this PBP blog post at www.participatorybudgeting.org/blog/participatory-budgeting-for-community-colleges-palo-alto-college-in-san-antonio.

Register for Oct. 28th Confab on Nevins Democracy Leaders Program

NCDD member organizations, be sure to join us next Wednesday, October 28th from 2-3pm Eastern/11am-12pm Pacific for a special NCDD Confab Call that can help your organization build capacity and contribute to the field!Confab bubble image

This call will feature a discussion with long-time NCDD member Dr. John Gastil, who will be sharing about the amazing opportunity for organizations in the D&D field to host a bright Penn State fellow next summer through the McCourtney Institute‘s Nevins Democracy Leaders Program! Stipends and living expenses are provided to the students through the program.

This is a rare opportunity for our field, and the Confab will be one of the best ways to find out more about how your organization can benefit, so make sure to register today to secure your spot on the call!

The Nevins Democracy Leaders Program – recently founded after a gift from NCDD Sustaining Member David Nevins – provides education and ­training in transpartisan leadership skills by exposing participants to a variety of viewpoints and philosophies and teaches the tools of dialogue and deliberation as well as critical thinking. But perhaps most uniquely, the Nevins Program works to grow the next generation of democracy leaders by placing students in unique fellowship position in organizations focused on D&D, transpartisan dialogue, and civic renewal – that means organizations like yours!

Mccourtney Institute LogoNCDD is partnering with the McCourtney Institute to help identify FABULOUS organizations that can host Nevins fellows (among other roles we’ll be playing).

On this Confab, John Gastil will provide an overview of the Nevins program and its aims, discuss the training that the future fellows are going through, and share more about how your organization can take advantage of this great chance to help cultivate the next generation of D&D leaders while getting more support for your work – all for FREE! You really don’t want to miss this call!

Our confabs (interactive conference calls) are free and open to all NCDD members and potential members. Register today if you’d like to join us!

Featured D&D Story: University & Community Action for Racial Equity

Today we’re pleased to be featuring another example of dialogue and deliberation in action. This mini case study was submitted by NCDD member Dr. Frank Dukes of the University of Virginia’s Institute for Environmental Negotiation via NCDD’s new Dialogue Storytelling Tool. Do you have a dialogue story that our network could learn from? Add your dialogue story today!


ShareYourStory-sidebarimageTitle of Project:

University & Community Action for Racial Equity (UCARE)

Description

The University and Community Action for Racial Equity (UCARE) is dedicated to helping the University of Virginia and the Charlottesville area communities work together to understand the University’s history of slavery, segregation, and discrimination and to find ways to address and repair the legacy of those harms.

UCARE participants represent a broad cross-section of community members and University students, staff and faculty. Our efforts at working across sometimes polarized divides represent positive steps towards truth, understanding, repair and authentic relationship and promote real outcomes to achieve racial equity.
UCARE has had a transformative impact on the University and Central Virginia.

Which dialogue and deliberation approaches did you use or borrow heavily from?

  • Restorative Justice approaches

What was your role in the project?

Founder and project manager

What issues did the project primarily address?

  • Race and racism
  • Economic issues
  • Education
  • Planning and development

Lessons Learned

With persistent hard work of listening to concerns and problems, UCARE has transformed substantial elements of the University-community relationship. To list just a few of the key achievements, in the last few years UCARE has accomplished the following:

  • Published a major report documenting community concerns and offering substantial recommendations to encourage truth-seeking, understanding, repair, and relationship.
  • Been a major catalyst in the President’s Commission on Slavery at the University of Virginia. Thanks largely to the efforts of the UCARE steering committee member and three former UCARE interns who are on the Commission, their mandate includes determining remedies for contemporary issues of race and equity. This will include curricular changes, responses to community concerns, memorialization of the full history of the university, and more.
  • Triggered a review of the admissions procedures at the University of Virginia in order to promote increasing number of African-American students. UCARE convened a widely-publicized forum in 2013 pointing to a serious decline in undergraduate African-American enrollment, which then initiated a conversation with the Dean of Admissions.
  • Through a weekly newsletter with over 270 subscribers, built strong networks promoting racial justice and equity by highlighting projects and events in the community and at the University addressing issues of race and equity.
  • Engaged substantial numbers of students and faculty in assisting community organizations; for just two examples, connecting the Charlottesville Task Force on Disproportionate Minority Contact in the Juvenile Justice System with university faculty, and providing intern support for beginning of the African American Heritage Center at the Jefferson School.
  • Transformed the language and focus of University leaders at all levels. For example, the student-run University Guides has a newly developed African American history tour, incorporates racialized history in all its tours (as the only group at UVa doing tours, U-Guides offers all of the visitor tours and all of the admissions tours), and has transformed itself from a nearly all-white organization to one that is now racially diverse.
  • Initiated a review of Central Virginia programs focused on youth, with particular attention to juvenile justice.
  • Working with leadership of the President’s Commission on Slavery at the University, developing a summer youth leadership program that will bring targeted young people to the University of Virginia. This program is currently the subject of a class project through the UCARE-sponsored class, “University of Virginia History: Race and Repair,” itself a pioneering class that includes community members as participants studying alongside students.
  • Created and maintained a weekly newsletter promoting events of interest concerning race and equity. This newsletter currently has about 270 subscribers from the university and community.
  • UCARE is now focusing on ways of institutionalizing its presence. One idea gaining support is to establish a center for community-university partnerships, based on the successful models of other universities, most notably the Netter Center for Community Partnerships at the University of Pennsylvania. UCARE will be bringing a number of community and university members for a visit in May to explore the Netter Center model.

Where to learn more about the project:

Website is currently inactive although UCARE continues, but has legacy material and should be active again soon: ucareva.org. We also have a more active Facebook page and a highly active weekly news about issues of race and equity that goes out to close to 350 individuals.

Re-imagining Philadelphia’s Community-Police Relations

Relations between communities and police continues to be one of the most relevant yet difficult dialogue issues of our day, so we wanted to share this recent piece that the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation – an NCDD member organization – recently shared about a police-community dialogue event in Philadelphia on their Challenges to Democracy blog. It provides a look into how these dialogues can begin and the impact they can have on their participants – and their facilitators. Read more below or find the original post here.


Philadelphia Engages Young People in Dialogue on Community-Police Relations

Ash logoIn this post, originally published by MBK Philly, Harvard Graduate School of Design student Courtney D. Sharpe recaps the latest in a series of efforts by My Brother’s Keeper Philadelphia and city agencies to engage youth in a dialogue on community-police relations. The one-day summit, attended by over 200 young people, and subsequent roundtable in City Hall were intended as platforms for youth, especially youth of color, to be able to share their stories and offer suggestions for ways that police and the community can adapt behaviors or policies to work better together. Sharpe is working with My Brother’s Keeper Philadelphia this summer as an Ash Center Summer Fellow. Read more about My Brother’s Keeper Philadelphia, the local affiliate of a national effort launched by President Obama to tackle the opportunity gaps for boys and young men of color. 

This summer began with harrowing tales that exposed latent racism in communities and disproportionate police force used against minority communities across the nation. The tragic AME church massacre and subsequent church fires, the fight to keep flying the confederate flag, and the images of seeing innocent black children chased by police with guns drawn made for an emotional, and inherently politically charged, beginning to the season.

Like many parts of the rest of the country, Philadelphia looked on at these events with horror and sympathy – during this climate of heightened awareness we reflected to create opportunities for interaction among community members to prevent similar travesties from happening in our neighborhoods.

On June 3, My Brother’s Keeper Philadelphia, in partnership with the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations, the Police Advisory Commission, and the Mayor’s Office of Immigrant and Multicultural Affairs, hosted “Securing Our Future,” a one-day summit on re-imagining Philadelphia’s community-police relations. The event brought together youth from neighborhoods across the city of diverse ethnic backgrounds along with city officials and police officers to have a facilitated dialogue about the youth’s experience with police.

“Securing Our Future” Summit

The goal of the event was to provide a platform for youth, especially youth of color, to be able to share their stories and offer suggestions for ways that police and the community can adapt behaviors or policies to work better together. The event had over 220 youth and youth advocates who were mostly teenagers and young adults but one class of fifth and sixth graders were also present. The conversations were rich and the youth were engaged in the process.

As a Texan, in the wake of the images and video from McKinney, Texas, I felt particularly moved to be involved in the implementation and report back structure of the events developed for youth-police interaction. No one should see on the television neighborhoods that resemble their own, with people who look like them, being attacked for existing in space.

I was fortunate to be able to serve as a facilitator at one of the tables. One of our first questions asked the youth what positive experiences or memories they had with the police; I was struck that at my table they were not able to come up with any.

At that time city officials at the table began to interject with numerous stories of their own, mostly in their professional capacity. I felt that some of them spoke as if to teach or preach and I was grateful that at the break when people chose different tables my group did not have other adults. I was able to ask questions and get the youth to speak to each other. It was raw, honest, and cathartic. One of the girls at the table was a Chinese immigrant and she shared stories of negative police interaction in three states.

As a follow up to the summit, every young person in attendance that was interested was invited to attend a special meeting on June 10 at City Hall in the Mayor’s Reception Room for the presentations of the findings to the Police Department and to participate in a moderated discussion with police officers. Around fifteen youth participated in the roundtable discussion.

At the conclusion of the formal program, Deputy Commissioner Bethel announced his plans to create a youth advisory council and invited all of the youth present to join as they had demonstrated leadership and commitment to being a part of the change process. The formal event was followed by a pizza party in the Council Caucus Room where police officers, City staff and youth continued their conversations joyfully. It was an auspicious beginning to a necessary dialogue.

You can find the original version of this Challenges to Democracy blog post at www.challengestodemocracy.us/home/philadelphia-engages-young-people-in-dialogue-on-community-police-relations/#sthash.F9TlQVGw.dpuf.