Help Everyday Democracy Learn, Win $30

EvDem LogoOur partners with Everyday Democracy, one NCDD’s long-term organizational members, are offering a great opportunity – from now until December 19th, they are seeking input from the engagement community about what kinds of issues we care about and what resources we need. They have created a survey that they will use to help develop future tools and resources for dialogue on community issues – on top of the great resources they already offer – and if you take the survey, you will have a chance to win one of five $30 Amazon gift cards.

We know that many of our NCDD members use Everyday Democracy’s tools and resources, so we strongly encourage you to take their quick 10-minute survey by visiting www.surveymonkey.com/s/2NQTPXZ. You can also find it on Everyday Democracy’s website by clicking here.

The survey closes on December 19th, so we recommend you fill it out now before the holiday rush starts. Soon after the survey ends, EvDem will be sharing the high-level lessons and reflections they take from the survey back out into the community, which promises to be a helpful learning tool in itself, so keep an eye out for that down the line.

We hope you’ll fill out the survey soon! You’ll be helping your D&D community, and you could be getting a little extra money for holiday shopping, too!

Free book for first 60 people to register on Friday!

Here’s an incentive for showing up early to get your name tag and tote on Friday morning! Registration opens at 8am.

ReadTheRoom-coverThis weekend’s NCDD conference coincides with the publication of a new book called Read the Room For Real: How a Simple Technology Creates Better Meetings. The book is intended for facilitators, presenters, conference planners, or anyone who is curious about how to use increasingly accessible audience polling technology to improve meetings.

We are happy to provide preview copies of the book – which include a back cover endorsement from Sandy for which we are very grateful – as a gift to the first 60 people who register for the conference.

Our book is one of the first that we know of focused on the use of audience polling technology outside of the classroom environment. We have a deep background in facilitating dialogues about difficult diversity issues and as well as refining dialogic processes on all matter of topics for very small to very large groups of people. In our view, polling technology is severely under-appreciated by not just the dialogue community, but also by city planners, public officials, diversity professionals, and many others. Our goal is to accelerate the time when audience polling technology is as commonplace a meeting tool as Powerpoint.

We are organizing a campaign to make this dialogue book an Amazon bestseller on its launch day, November 28 (Black Friday). All conference attendees will have information in their packet about how to participate in the campaign, how to get a discount on the book, and how to enter a drawing to get a full day of pro-bono in-person consulting on audience polling.

For those not coming to the conference but who are interested in learning more about the book, contact us at david@read-the-room.com.

- David Campt and Matthew Freeman

Free 3-Part Webinar on Talking about Difficult Public Issues

We want to share the following announcement from the American Library Association Center for Civic Life, and the David Mathews Center for Civic Life about a great 3-part webinar on discussing public issues that starts next week. We found the announcement over at the NIF blog, and hope you will read it below or view it here.

Does your community have a problem that looks like this?

Join us to learn how you can help overcome deadlock and lead change in your community.

Session 1: “Beyond Deadlock: A Better Way to Talk about Difficult Issues”

Tuesday, October 14, 4 – 5 p.m. EDT / 3 – 4 p.m. CDT / 1 – 2 p.m. PDT

  • Learn to help people work together to talk about public issues and make choices.
  • Uncover the deeper concerns of our communities.
  • Register for Session 1 at http://bit.ly/namingframing1

Session 2: “Tools for Naming and Framing Public Issues”

Wednesday, December 3, 4 – 5 p.m. EDT / 3 – 4 p.m. CDT / 1 – 2 p.m. PDT

  • Learn the steps and processes for leading a “naming and framing” effort.
  • Apply tools that help people weigh options for moving forward together
  • Register for Session 1 at http://bit.ly/namingframing2

Session 3: Check-in (date TBD)

  • Share experiences with fellow participants in a follow-up webinar or conference call.
  • Registration is free, but space is limited. Participation in all three sessions is encouraged.

Questions? Contact Nancy Kranich, nancy.kranich@rutgers.edu.

Questions for Thinking Through Collective Impact Strategy

We know many in the NCDD community are interested in collective impact strategies, so we wanted to share a helpful piece on the subject from the blog of one of our newest NCDD members, Beth Tener of the New Directions Collaborative. We encourage you to her thoughts below or find the original here.

Several clients recently have asked us to help with strategic planning. The more I have worked with networks and cross-sector initiatives, I have seen the limits of the traditional way of thinking about strategy. Typically, a strategy will be for one organization to look out at the world, assess “strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats” and devise an action plan for how they will influence change in the world.

When thinking about strategy for a network and/or multi-organization collaborative initiative, it calls for a different set of questions (as this section of our web site explores.) One key difference is to shift from a specific goal of one organization to focus on creating conditions for various players who work in the field to work more effectively by aligning their work around a shared goal and and finding ways to collaborate.

Here are examples of questions to craft a network-oriented strategy, from our work with non-profits and others working on social change goals such as growing a local food economy or improving educational outcomes for students in a community:

  • Where are most effective places to intervene in the system to achieve our shared goal?
  • What is needed to inspire, enable, and support people at these key parts of the system to self-organize and pursue this goal, e.g., transition their choices to more local foods?
  • Who is doing what? (This is where a network mapping and social network analysis can be quite valuable.)
  • Where are there gaps/overlaps?
  • What needs to happen collectively that individual people or organizations can’t make happen? (Or, said another way: What are projects or activities that are needed to reach the goal that no one organization can pull off alone?)
  • What needs to happen to change the system that’s not happening?
  • Seeing this, where does it make sense for the network to focus as to not overlap with these organizations?

(In most areas of social change, there is a crowded field of players that keeps changing. For the network to stay relevant it needs to assess regularly where it is adding value to keep strategic focus.)

  • What are criteria for actions/projects/investments for the network or collaborative initiative? For example:
    • Provide connection/learning across multiple organizations/sectors; amplify learning by aggregating knowledge of the field
    • Advance progress on barriers common across organizations, e.g., host a joint forum/summit about an area of barrier/opportunity
    • Align and coordinate work on key leverage points, e.g., facilitate work groups or task forces, invest and share research
    • Provide centralized support functions that the whole field can use/contribute to (e.g., metrics, message Q&A boards or list serv)
    • Incubate ideas and/or invest in a space, where there is a need that is not being addressed
    • Capitalize on connections – enable members to gain greater access through mutual connections, e.g., policy advocacy, connections to decision-makers, research

Telling Our Stories: Featured Entries to NCDD’s Dialogue Storytelling Tool

NCDD has been experimenting with collecting examples of dialogue and deliberation projects through the “Dialogue Storytelling Tool” we launched last summer at www.ncdd.org/storytelling-tool.

SuccessStoriesCoverIn partnership with the Kettering Foundation, we’ve been gathering brief case studies and project descriptions from dialogue and deliberation practitioners. Today we’re releasing a 19-page report that shares some of the best entries we’ve received so far.

Please check it out, share it widely, and add your stories today!

Some of the projects you’ll learn about in the doc are UrbanMatters, Migrant Farmworkers Reading Project, the Oregon Citizens Initiative Review, the Palestinian-Jewish Living Room Dialogue, Engaging in Aging, and more.

It has always been more challenging to collect case examples of projects than to get people to share information on their organization, method, or fee-based programs like upcoming trainings. Our strategy with the Dialogue Storytelling Tool is to keep the tool as simple as possible, and to emphasize the convenience of filling out a simple form in order to share your work with Kettering, with Participedia, and on the NCDD blog.

These are the only required fields in the form:

  • Name and email
  • Title of program
  • Short description
  • Your role in the project

All additional fields are optional!  We encourage NCDD members to get in the habit of submitting the basics of all your projects on the tool. We’ll create publications like this one featuring your stories, share them with our friends at Kettering and Participedia, and we hope to eventually feature them on a map of projects.

NCDD members are busy, and we know it’s difficult to find the time to tell people about all your great projects. The Dialogue Storytelling Tool makes it easy to report on your dialogue and deliberation projects and events, and let NCDD help spread the word.

Kettering, Participedia, and NCDD are all interested in what you’ve got going on, and may follow up with you to learn more about your work.

Look for this image in the sidebar on the NCDD site whenever you have a moment to share your project’s story:

ShareYourStory-sidebarimage

Top #NCDD Resources for Addressing Racial Conflict & Inequality

The NCDD community has a long history and strong track record of helping people address racism, racial tensions and inequity in their communities. Many of our long-time members were drawn to dialogue work during national crises we’re all reminded of as the situation in Ferguson, Missouri plays out, like the 1991 Rodney King trial, and subsequent Los Angeles riots back in 1992.

These days, with social media and 24 hour news at our fingertips, it seems like local crises can become national crises in a heartbeat. The shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri is the latest in a long string of incidents that spark outrage in cities where racial tension and inequity is already high, and raise public concern about police treatment of minorities, fairness in the U.S. justice system, media bias, wealth and opportunity gaps, and more.

FacingRacism-coverIn times like these, dialogue is key to helping people come together across divides (power divides, income divides, race divides, political divides) to talk through what’s happening and see if we can agree on steps to take going forward.

I want to point you to some helpful resources on race dialogue developed by NCDD members.

Recently, we’ve shared these top-notch resource compilations from a long-time leader in race dialogue, Everyday Democracy:

In the NCDD Resource Center, where you’ll find nearly 3,000 carefully indexed resources to help you in this important work, it’s worth checking out the 67 resources in our Race Issues tag.

Maggie Potapchuk’s resource-rich website, Racial Equity Tools, is another important destination for those engaging people across racial divides.

And you should certainly utilize the discussion guides that NCDDers have developed around these issues…

  • Racial and Ethnic Tensions: What Should We Do? (NIF Issue Guide)
  • Crime & Punishment: Imagining a Safer Future for All (IF Discussion Guide)
  • Community Dialogue Guide (US DOJ’s Community Relations Service)
  • Fostering Dialogue Across Divides: A Nuts and Bolts Guide (Public Conversations Project)
  • Facing Racism in a Diverse Nation (Everyday Democracy)

In the Resource Center, I found these by utilizing the sidebar search tool that says “I’m Looking For…” and selecting “manuals & guides” for Resource Type (category) and “race issues” under On This Topic (tag).

What do YOU think are the best resources to help people run dialogues on race issues or the other issues being surfaced by the events in Ferguson? Please add them via the comments here.

IF Releases New Discussion Guides on Childhood & Intellectual Property

We are pleased to share that our friends at The Interactivity Foundation recently released new Discussion Reports on two important public issues: the future of childhood and intellectual property. The Interactivity Foundation is an NCDD organizational member and we’re also proud to list them as one of the All-Star Sponsors of NCDD 2014.

IF creates these reports by distilling public policy possibilities and materials generated from introductory Project Discussions they have hosted on topics of social and political concern, and the reports then become starting points or guides for future Public Discussions which delve deeper into these possibilities. IF’s Discussion Reports can be downloaded for free and used to help facilitate conversations exploring public policy solutions to key issues.

The first new report, “What Might Childhood Look Like in the Future?,” focuses on the ways we can address the changing nature of the way our kids experience their childhoods.

IF-Childhood-BookWhitney Houston sings in The Greatest Love of All (1985) that “the children are our future.”  What, though, is the future of childhood?  What does it mean, in our society, to be a child– or to have a childhood?  And what might it mean in the future? …Perhaps we need to re-think what childhood might look like in the 21st Century. This project will ask some difficult questions and consider multiple, alternatives answers. For example:

  • How might we address broader social issues directly affecting childhood such as homelessness, abuse, neglect, crime, and violence—whether on the streets or in their homes and at the hand of a parent or caregiver?
  • How do we best raise children who will be competent enough to navigate the complexities of our modern world? What traits will they need?
  • Are there ways to build and develop our supporting villages that will be both more supportive and less threatening to parents and caregivers?
  • What other issues might affect children growing up 20, 30, or 40 years from now?

The PDF version of this report is available for download here.

The second newly released report, “Invention, Innovation, and Intellectual Property,” looks at the controversies and potential solutions to the complex world of intellectual property.

What does it mean to invent something? Why is innovation important to us as individuals, to our economy, and our society overall? How should our laws, regulations, and institutions be structured so as to best encourage, support, protect, and otherwise regulate invention and innovation? What should be the public policy framework for new or unique ideas and expressions of intellectual property? …These and many similarly thorny questions are raised by this topic and the discussion materials in this guidebook. To help launch your own discussion and exploration of these ideas, the materials in this guidebook include:

  1. A set of broad opening discussion questions (and possible alternative or contrasting answers), and
  2. Six different public policy responses or frameworks that respond to some of the issues raised by the opening questions and concerns.

The PDF version of this report is available for download here.

Each discussion guide is available in both digital and print format, and you can find more information on The Interactivity Foundation’s website, www.interactivityfoundation.org, and on the corresponding project pages.

Presentation from June’s Tech Tues on MaestroConference

For our June 24th Tech Tuesday, Brian Burt, CEO and founder of MaestroConference, hosted a session that gave a preview of major new changes in their platform. MaestroConference is the leader in “Social Conferencing” technology, serving more than 5 million participants, and is launching a new Social Webinar platform with a visual interface which allows people to see the faces of the people they’re talking to and edit documents together. Click here to see the PPT presentation from this session.

Tech_Tuesday_BadgeMany NCDDers are familiar with MaestroConference, as we’ve used it for past online activities courtesy of NCDD member Ben Roberts who has served as a host for many calls. MaestroConference is well-known in our field because of its alignment with group process techniques — including its unique ability to enable break-out groups to form on conference calls.

MaestroConference is interested in “conversations that change the world” and invited NCDDers to a free 30 day trial.

Look over archives of past Tech Tuesdays and news about upcoming Tech Tuesday events at www.ncdd.org/tech-tuesdays.

Six Simple Changes for Better Public Engagement

NCDD supporting member Jennifer Wilding of Consensus and her team have been working to increase civility in Kansas City, and we love their infographic on what KC residents told them officials can do to improve public engagement. Learn more about Consensus’ Civility Project at www.consensuskc.org/civilityproject/ and in Jennifer’s write-up below the image.

SixChangesForOfficials-infographic

Old Habits for Engaging the Public Make it Harder to Be Civil

Americans have talked a lot about civility the last few years. Along with exploring the way individuals behave, it’s important to pay attention to the processes that are used to engage the public. Outmoded habits are ineffective with a population that increasingly expects to be consulted, and can be disastrous in situations where values are in conflict.

It’s possible to change these habits, though. Specific, relatively simple changes can move people’s behavior from angry to productive. The Civility Project helps inform and advocate for building new habits that increase civility.

Consensus, a Kansas City-based nonprofit that focuses on public engagement, launched The Civility Project out of frustration with the way the 2009 health-care town hall meetings were conducted. Using the public hearing model meant that meetings intended to give people a voice ended up driving them further apart.

The project so far includes awards for people who bring civility to life and a one-day class on building civility into public engagement based on findings from 20 focus groups with local citizens. In addition, Consensus has held public forums co-sponsored by KCPT Public Television, the Congressional Civility Caucus and the Dole Institute.

Consensus held 20 focus groups across metro Kansas City and in Lawrence to talk about civility in public life and how it affects our ability to solve problems. The groups represented the entire political spectrum, but were in perfect harmony when they described what concerns them about our public processes and what would make things better.

Detailed findings are available at www.consensuskc.org/civilityproject, and we have distilled what people want into six simple changes elected officials can make to engage their constituents more productively.

For more information: Jennifer Wilding, jenwilding@consensuskc.org.

 

Two New Issue Guides from NIF

NIF-logoOur partners at the National Issues Forums Institute – an NCDD organizational member – have just released two new issue guides for helping facilitate dialogue and public deliberation around two important issues: mental health and alcohol abuse. As always, NIFI’s discussion guides present three different approaches to addressing the problem at hand for participants to weigh.

In the mental health guide, “Mental Illness in America: How Do We Address a Growing Problem?“, the three options presented are as follows:

Option One: “Put Safety First” - This option would make public safety the top priority and support intervention, if necessary, to provide help for those with serious mental illness.

Option Two: “Expand Services” - This option would make mental health services as widely available as possible so that people can get the help they need.

Option Three: “Let People Plot Their Own Course” - This option would reduce the number of mental illness diagnoses and curtail the use of psychiatric medications, allowing for more individuality.

And in the alcohol abuse guide, “Alcohol in America: What Can We Do about Excessive Drinking?“, the options are framed this way:

Option One: “Protect Others from Danger” – Society should do what it takes to protect itself from the negative consequences of drinking behavior.

Option Two: “Help People with Alcohol Problems” - We need to help people reduce their drinking.

Option Three: “Change Society’s Relationship with Alcohol” - This option says that solutions must address the societal attitudes and environments that make heavy drinking widely accepted.

To find out more about these and other issue guides, you can visit the NIFI issue books store here.