A Brief History of Daylight Savings Time

I’m watching the sun set, shortly after 4pm on a Monday afternoon.

Winter is all downhill from here.

Officially, we are now back on Standard Time, but the luxuriously long days of summer make the idea of “daylight saving” seem trivial. In Boston, the 2015 Summer solstice enjoyed 15 hours and 17 minutes of daylight. Our Winter solstice will see just 9 hours and 4 minutes of natural light.

No amount of adjusting the time will create more sunlight in a day.

So why do we do this terrible dance from Standard time to Daylight Savings, and tragically back to Standard?

In April 1916, residents of the German Empire were the first to turn their clocks back – this “summer time” schedule was intended to conserve energy for the war effort. (Interestingly, Berlin’s Summer solstice sees nearly 17 hours of daylight!).

The idea was presumably effective, as it was adopted by other European countries shortly thereafter. (Though there are some indications that the move wasn’t entirely popular outside the major cities.)

In 1918, the U.S. Congress passed the Standard Time Act, an “An Act to save daylight and to provide standard time, for the United States.”

Summer time was generally discontinued after the war.

Daylight Savings was so unpopular in the United States that Congress overrode a Presidential veto and repealed its implementation effective the last Sunday of October, 1919.

In 1942, Congress implemented “war time,” which established that “the standard time of each zone…shall be advanced one hour [until] 6 months after the termination of the present war.”

After the war, many cities and states kept the adjusted time for summer months. While others dropped the adjusted time all together. As Wikipedia comments, “In the 1964 Official Railway Guide, 21 of the 48 states had no DST anywhere.”

In 1966, things began to change. The Uniform Time Act was the first to set national dates for transitioning to and from Daylight Savings Time. It encouraged states to participate in the time change, though states did have the right to opt-out.

Interestingly, the Act transferred management of the time change from the Interstate Commerce Commission to the Department of Transportation.

The specific times and dates of change have been adjusted a few times since then, but it’s that 1966 Act which really established Daylight Savings Time as we know it.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmail

Join D&D Climate Action Network Launch Call Nov. 17

NCDD is proud to be supporting an important new project being led by NCDD supporting member Linda Ellinor of the Dialogue Group aimed at connecting D&D professionals who are concerned about climate change. The network will launch with a conference call on Nov. 17 from 2-4pm PST for folks interested in being part of the core group, and its work could be quite impactful with the right supporters. Learn more about the network and how to get involved in Linda’s announcement below.


Announcing the D&D Climate Action Network (D&D CAN)

First Teleconference Call: November 17th, 2015

Are you a D&D practitioner or facilitator concerned about climate change? Are you looking to connect with like-minded peers who wish to use participatory processes or conversational leadership in helping to meet this challenge?

We invite you to join this NCDD-supported D&D Climate Action Network. Our goal is to help each other work more strategically within groups we are already involved in and to explore synergies between us for new actions and groups we might work with. We aim to build a community of practice that fosters mutual learning, sharing, and inspires collaboration around the complexities of climate change.

Initially, we will hold monthly 90-minute to 2-hour teleconference calls* using Zoom technology (a more advanced form of Skype) and communicating in between these times via Ning to share resources and advance our connections.

In these early meetings, we expect to focus primarily on building relationships with each other and exploring our respective work and aspirations. As we develop, we may dive more deeply into specific subjects and opportunities for action, some of us thinking, studying and strategizing together, inviting speakers, etc.. We will basically allow ourselves to self-organize around our unfolding interests.

If you are interested in joining this new network, we ask that you contact either Linda Ellinor at lellinor25[at]gmail[dot]com (707 217-6675) or Marti Roach at martiroach[at]gmail[dot]com (925 963-9631).

Our first teleconference call is scheduled for November 17th from 2 – 4pm PST.* We are limiting the initial calls to the first 16 people who sign up to help establish a core network, so please contact us soon to express your interest.

*Please note that while we will keep the formal teleconference calls to 90 minutes, you might want to plan for a total of 2 hours to allow for some follow-up networking after the formal call is over.

Co-hosting team: Linda Ellinor, co-founder of The Dialogue Group/Senior Associate with Applied Concepts Group; Marti Roach, Marti Roach Consulting, Rosa Zubizaretta, DiaPraxis, Nancy Glock-Grueneich, V.P. Research Intellitics and CII Fellow; Sharon Joy Kleitsch, The Connections Partners; Tim Bonneman, CEO and President of Intellitics.

Learn more by visiting http://ddclimateactionnetwork.ning.com.

U. of MS SOPHIA Chapter Interest Survey

Logo of the Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA).

Conversational meeting in progress in Oxford, MS.People in and around Oxford, MS,

The Society of Philosophers in America (SOPHIA) is now a member and chapter organization. We are founding our chapter in Oxford this academic year and are gathering information from people who might be interested in participating in our chapter. SOPHIA is a national nonprofit that has been around since 1983. Our aim is to use the tools of philosophical inquiry to improve people’s lives and enrich the profession of philosophy through conversation and community building.
If you are interested in learning more or know you’d like to participate in our SOPHIA chapter here in Oxford,

Logo for surveymonkey.Please fill out this SURVEY.

 

(It’s short)

We haA conversational meeting in progress.ve plans for a first gathering on Friday, December 11th, to have a short, relaxed conversation on the nature of and challenges for community. Dr. Andrea Houchard will be our invited facilitator, and she has had great success building a chapter in Flagstaff, AZ.

the Ohio marijuana initiative and the corruption of our republic

Ohioans vote tomorrow on the Marijuana Legalization Initiative, Issue 3. It is like a stew composed of horrible aspects of our current politics–not legalizing pot, which is fine with me, but allowing rich people to buy public policy, governments to enable rent-seeking and oligopolies, political professionals to manipulate voters, and special interests to extract private benefits in return for enabling popular reforms to pass.

Issue 3 would legalize marijuana but restrict large-scale cultivation to the ten individuals who bankrolled the referendum. The outcomes for the people of Ohio may be better if Issue 3 passes than under the status quo, because ten may be a good number of licensed producers. Zero legal distributors is too few. Prohibiting marijuana creates an illegal industry that causes huge damage. Also, I am enough of a libertarian to believe that if consenting adults want to do something like smoke pot, the presumption should favor their liberty to do so as long as they follow laws protecting others. On the other hand, if anyone can grow and market marijuana, prices will fall and usage will rise, which will have serious consequences for public health. Licensing ten growers may inflate prices and allow the government to regulate the industry effectively–a good balance.

But the voters are not asked to approve ten licenses that go to the highest bidders. They are presented with the opportunity to give state-mandated monopolies to ten wealthy rent-seekers. It’s like the days when kings gave favored courtiers the royal privilege to manufacture specific items in return for gifts and favors. Only it is worse than that, because it enlists the voters in creating these monopolies. In On Revolution, Hannah Arendt noted that corruption was traditionally a sin of rulers, but with democracy, the people can for the first time be corrupted. Issue 3 is blatant yet typical effort to do that.

To their credit, Ohioans have also proposed Issue 2, which specifically prohibits any state amendment that “grants or creates a monopoly, oligopoly, or cartel, specifies or determines a tax rate, or confers a commercial interest, commercial right, or commercial license that is not available to other similarly situated persons.” If both initiatives pass, interesting litigation will ensue. But even if Issue 2 passes, this is really no way to govern.

See also: bottom-up struggles against corruption: a frontier of democracy and the Supreme Court reflects the “degeneracy of the times”.

Download Everyday Democracy’s Community Grant List

We know that the search for funding is a constant struggle in our field, so we highly recommend you check out the community grant list that was compiled by the great team at NCDD member organization Everyday Democracy. All you have to do to get a free download of this great resource is sign up for their email newsletter. You can learn more in the EvDem announcement below or sign up here.


EvDem LogoThe Big List of Community Grants

When you’re implementing ideas to help change your community, you’ll often need to find some external funding. We’ve compiled this list of grant opportunities from around the U.S. to help you jump start your action efforts.

Introducing…

The Big List of Community Action Grants

Here’s what you’ll find in this list:

  • 60 grant opportunities
  • Details on the grant amount, area funded, deadlines, and geographic location
  • Funding for a wide variety of issue areas including youth empowerment, education, strengthening democracy, sustainability, immigration, art and media projects, poverty, and more.
  • Direct links to more information about the requirements

If you’re looking for external funding to boost your community change efforts, this list is the perfect place to start. This list has compiles all the important details in one place, making it easy to decide whether to pursue the opportunity further.

To access the grant list, enter your name and email into the form at www.everyday-democracy.org/resources/big-list-community-action-grants

Then go check your email! Once you click the link to confirm your subscription, another email will be sent to you immediately with instructions on how to access the grant list. Be sure to check your spam folder, or your “social” or “promotions” tabs in Gmail, for the confirmation email.

If you run into problems or are already subscribed to our e-newsletter, contact Rebecca Reyes, Communication Manager, at rreyes@everyday-democracy.org.

You can find the original version of this Everyday Democracy post at www.everyday-democracy.org/resources/big-list-community-action-grants.