Compassion is the Best Defense in the Great Computer War

There is a whole genre dedicated to the fear of computers turning against us and taking over the world. And as our capacity to build Artificial Intelligence improves, this concern seems to become more and more palpable.

A computer can win at Jeopardy. That puts us at 15 minutes til midnight on the computer war doomsday clock. Or thereabouts.

And there is, at least in theory, good reason to be concerned about domination by computers.

Computers have so much control over our lives it would be fairly simple for them to take us. Even if they don’t build huge robot armies of Terminators, they could wreak plenty of havoc through control of cars, airplanes, and missile launch systems.

But perhaps more concerning is the fundamental ways computers operate. Many computer doomsday scenarios envision computers who take their instructions too literally – destroying humanity to fulfill their command of making the world better.

Others stress the ruthless efficiency with which computers can operate – given a goal and the ability to learn, a futuristic computer could try unlimited permutations before determining how to reach its goal. A person can be defeated, but under this scenario a computer can not – it will always try again and always try better.

But what makes us think the computers – even if they were to gain sentience – would want to destroy us in the first place?

Perhaps because we know that’s what we would do.

Humanity’s history is one of dominance and destruction. It’s a history of enslavement and appropriation, of bending every one and everything to our will.

And to be fair, it’s probably that ruthlessness that has gotten us so far in this world. They say, for example, that neanderthals died out because they were too kind.

It’s a harsh world, and only the harshest survive.

But times have changed. We have dominated. We have reshaped the world in our image.

And we fear our creations will have that same drive that got us here, those same Darwinian instincts.

So perhaps it is time to let go of that harshness. To live in a world of love and respect, where all living things are valued.

If we could truly embrace such values, if we could pass such values on to those who follow –

Well, then, surely the computers would show us that same humanity.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmail

Bologna, a Laboratory for Urban Commoning

Anarchist anthropologist David Graeber argues in his recent book, The Utopia of Rules, that bureaucracy is the standard mechanism in contemporary life for coercing people to comply with the top-down priorities of institutions, especially corporations and government.  Anyone concerned with the commons, therefore, must eventually address the realities of bureaucratic power and the feasible alternatives. Is there a more human, participatory alternative that can actually work?

The good news is that the City of Bologna, Italy, is pioneering a new paradigm of municipal governance that suggests, yes, there are some practical, bottom-up alternatives to bureaucracy. 

Two weeks ago, the city government celebrated the first anniversary of its Bologna Regulation on public collaboration for urban commons, a system that actively invites ordinary citizens and neighborhoods to invent their own urban commons, with the government’s active assistance.  I joined about 200 people from Bologna and other Italian cities on May 15 for a conference that celebrated the Regulation, which is the formal legal authority empowering citizens to take charge of problems in their city. 

How does the program work? 

It starts by regarding the city as a collaborative social ecosystem. Instead of seeing the city simply as an inventory of resources to be administered by politicians and bureaucratic experts, the Bologna Regulation sees the city’s residents as resourceful, imaginative agents in their own right.  Citizen initiative and collaboration are regarded as under-leveraged energies that – with suitable government assistance – can be recognized and given space to work.  Government is re-imagined as a hosting infrastructure for countless self-organized commons.

To date, the city and citizens have entered into more than 90 different “pacts of collaboration” – formal contracts between citizen groups and the Bolognese government that outline the scope of specific projects and everyone’s responsibilities. The projects fall into three general categories – living together (collaborative services), growing together (co-ventures) and working together (co-production).

read more

Join the Transpartisan Conference in Boston this June 20th!

Those of you within driving distance of Boston won’t want to miss this event at UMass Boston on the 20th…

A partnership involving the Public Conversations Project, University of Massachusetts Boston’s Center for Peace, Democracy and Development, and the Bridge Alliance (which NCDD is part of) is hosting Boston’s first Transpartisan movement event at UMass Boston on June 20th, from 10am to 4pm.

This event is part of a national series of gatherings aimed at shifting our polarized political landscape, and finding more constructive ways to communicate across difference. Whether the conflict at hand is Boston 2024, tension between law enforcement and communities, or local disagreements around planning and development in our cities, we have to find better ways to talk with one another.

The gathering is part of an effort – spearheaded in part by NCDD organizational members Mark Gerzon and John Steiner of the Mediators Foundation – to help move our country’s politics beyond the partisan divides and gridlock to start making better decisions that move us all forward. This gathering will be building momentum from previous Transpartisan gatherings including the pre-conference gathering NCDD hosted in conjunction with our 2014 conference as well as gatherings in Colorado and San Francisco, and upcoming events planned in Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C.

Here’s how the organizers describe the conference:

The goal of this particular conference is to offer Boston’s leaders an opportunity to think collaboratively about how to shift the  electoral culture regionally and nationally, and find alternatives to the partisan political paralysis that dominates our public sphere…

Over the course of the day, eight speakers will share their vision for embedding the Transpartisan movement in our culture, and offer practical skills from cross-spectrum bridge-builders to transcend polarization. Speakers include Christian Science Monitor editor Marshall Ingwerson, representatives from No Labels and the Mediators Foundation, bridge-builders from across the political spectrum and educators from University of New Hampshire, Gordon College, and UMass Boston (full list available in the press release).

This gathering promises to be a pivotal conversation on how we in the D&D field can help transform the political climate in our country, and we encourage you to register today! There is a nominal $30 fee to attend.

You can check out the press release for the Transpartisan Conference here and find more information by visiting www.publicconversations.org/transpartisan.

We hope to see you there!

The Dangling Conversation

It can be easy to be overwhelmed by the ills of the world.

For years, I worked on efforts to end genocide in Darfur. Or, perhaps more accurately, I worked to raise awareness of genocide as a real problem. A problem that, perhaps, someone ought to do something about. People were dying.

We raised money for on-the-ground and advocacy organizations. We held events with survivors of genocides from the Armenian genocide to the present. We pointed to the dark history of humanity and the shameful inaction of our forefathers.

We questioned why there was always a reason for the U.S. not to get involved, for the world not to get involved.

There’s always a reason not to act.

But the people keep dying.

I’m reminded of that song by Simon and Garfunkel:

And we sit and drink our coffee
Couched in our indifference
Like shells upon the shore

You can hear the ocean roar
In the dangling conversation
And the superficial sighs,
The borders of our lives.
Yes, we speak of things that matter,
With words that must be said…

I long ago stopped engaging in anti-genocide work. I, like so many others, simply shake my head and heave the windy sigh.

I’ve moved on to other issues, other causes, other problems which also demand to be solved.

There are too many ills to take on them all.

And the dangling conversation remains the borders of our lives.

We each do our own work, focus on the accomplishable, perhaps, or simply tack into the wind for other causes. We each have our strategies for staying sane while we desperately try to bend the arc of the universe towards justice.

It is not easy work.

And there is always more work to do.

And there is always a reason not to act.

The best we can do, I think, is to constant question ourselves. To push to understand our own true goals an motivations.

When you throw up your hands and say, “well, what can be done?” are you genuinely too busy with other work or are you more or less comfortable with the status quo?

Do you genuinely think that nothing can change, or are you simply willing to accept things as they are?

You don’t have to announce your answer to the world, but you deserve to be honest with yourself.

There is too much work in this world, far too much, for any of us to do it alone.

No one person can do it all.

So forgive yourself for embracing some issues while being lukewarm on others, forgive yourself for preferring advocacy to direct service, or favoring one type of work for another.

Follow your strengths and your passions, but know there is always more work to be done.

And be skeptical of yourself when you find your dangling conversations, when you walk away from an issue rather than engage. There is only some much we can take on, sure, but we should push those borders back as far as possible.

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmail

Primary Sources Special Issue: Social Studies and the Young Learner

There are many teachers out there that are doing excellent stuff with primary sources, and if we want to make a difference in our field, we need to share that stuff with our colleagues. Are you a pre-K to grade 6 teacher doing some wonderful things with primary sources? Then why not share it with everyone? Let us see what you are doing and show us how we can do it too!

Teaching with Primary Sources
Guest Editor: Scott M. Waring
Submission Deadline: July 15, 2015
Articles in Social Studies and the Young Learner provide procedures for how social studies educators (history, geography, civics, economics, anthropology, etc.) can employ methods that are dynamic and effective. Primary sources are at the heart of what we do in social studies and are continually utilized in amazing ways, especially in the pre-K-6 classroom. Additionally, teaching with primary sources supports Common Core literacies and the C3 Framework for effective disciplinary practices. The guest editor for this issue is seeking manuscripts documenting how social studies educators are using primary sources to engage young learners in authentic and meaningful approaches to convey social studies content.

Manuscripts submitted for this special issue should:
1. Be of interest to classroom teachers and others in the elementary social studies community;
2. Accurately reflect the theme (Teaching with Primary Sources);
3. Include descriptions from the pre-K-6 classroom;
4. Be authored by classroom teachers and/or professors. The editors especially look for manuscripts co-authored by classroom teachers and professors or authored by pre-K-6 classroom teachers alone; and
5. Be about 3,000 words in length or less.

For more information about Social Studies and the Young Learner, as well as author guidelines and tips, visit http://www.socialstudies.org/publications/ssyl
Send submissions to the Guest Editor, Scott M. Waring, swaring@ucf.edu.


Cornel West’s Race Matters and the Politics of Democratic Respect

In 1993, responding to what he saw as misleading treatments of the Watts riots following the acquittal of four police officers a year earlier in Los Angeles after the violent beating of an unarmed black man, Cornel West wrote Race Matters. "Glib attempts to reduce its meaning to the pathologies of the black underclass, the criminal actions of hoodlums or the political revolt of the oppressed urban masses miss the mark," West argued. Rather, in his view,

what we witnessed in Los Angeles was the consequence of a lethal linkage of economic decline, cultural decay and political lethargy in American life. Race was the visible catalyst, not the underlying cause.


West made an impassioned, eloquent call for action on issues of racial injustice, poverty and despair, arguing that "our ideals of freedom, democracy and quality must be invoked to invigorate all of us, especially the landless, propertyless and luckless." He also struck an urgent tone. "Either we learn a new language of empathy or compassion or the fire this time will consume us all."

In the book, West proposes large-scale public action, often called for by liberals, to address black poverty and unemployment by ensuring access to social goods such as housing, food, health, education and jobs. He also argues, in the vein of conservative thinking, that liberals ignore dynamics of culture and identity. These are "the murky waters of despair and dread that now flood the streets of black America," which generate a mood of nihilism among many blacks. "The issues of black identity -- both black self-love and self-contempt," he concludes," sit alongside black poverty as realities to confront and transform."

The book merits renewed attention in 2015 following police shootings of unarmed African-Americans in recent months and protests across the nation. These have drawn attention not only to police action but also to African Americans communities as acute examples of diminished life chances, social challenges, and poverty which Robert Putnam describes in Our Kids, which I reviewed last week. In Baltimore, with a median value of $6,446, African-American households were 10 percent poorer in 2011 than in 1984. Whites and blacks with means have moved out of the East Side and West Baltimore. As Eric Singer wrote in "Why Baltimore Burns" in The Nation, "many residents interpret the area... as a physically, socially and economically isolated place of terror."

West's tone has become more pessimistic over the last two decades. In Race Matters West asks, "Do we have the intelligence, humor, imagination, courage, tolerance, love, respect and will to meet the challenge?" and concludes that "each of us can make a positive difference if we commit ourselves to do so." He also cites community organizing groups like BUILD in Baltimore "that bring power and pressure to bear on specific issues" as hopeful alternatives.

In recent years, West lambasts what he sees as the failure of the Obama administration. "The age of Obama has fallen tragically short of fulfilling King's prophetic legacy," he wrote in the New York Times. After the 2013 Inauguration he told C-Span that Obama's use of King's Bible "makes my blood boil."

West neglects technocratic power and its "cult of the expert" which disrespects the talents of everyday citizens, found in government and elsewhere and far beyond power of presidents to turn around.

As I described in Everyday Politics, a 1999 study by the Minnesota Board of Aging found that most citizens wanted civic opportunities to make a real difference on public problems but were well aware of obstacles. Both baby boomers and older citizens in the Board's focus groups said they wanted to do "more than volunteering," by contributing to rebuilding a sense of community and being involved in decision making. They wanted to learn civic skills such as working across differences of partisan belief, race and culture, and big picture thinking that tied specific tasks to large challenges facing the country.

They also felt that most institutions -- government, and also businesses, schools and nonprofits -- devalued their talents. Volunteer opportunities typically relegated people to "positions of mediocrity with the assumption that they lack to capacity to work on big issues that impact the community." Volunteers were rarely asked "what they are good at, what is important to them, and how they want to be part of shaping their community."

In his 1984 book Outgrowing Democracy, the conservative Catholic intellectual John Lukacs, a refugee from Hungary after the 1956 revolution, was shocked to find such disrespect. He had come to America believing our country overestimated the capacities of "the democratic masses." Whether that had ever been the case, he observed that America had shifted from a democratic order to a bureaucratic state system ruled by experts. Not only government but also the media, businesses, higher education, schools, and foundations had sharply diminished views of the talents of most people.

Barack Obama in 2008 repeatedly challenged such disrespect. In a campaign speech in Independence Missouri on June 30, he declared "the greatness of this country, its victories in war, its enormous wealth, its scientific and cultural achievements, all result from the energy and imagination of the American people, their toil, drive, struggle, restlessness, humor and quiet heroism."

In such a view, wise leaders are important, but not the driving agents of change. Democracy rests on those whom one contemporary Revolutionary leader called "the people without the frosting," unheralded citizens practiced at running their own affairs and building communities. Martin Luther King centuries later made the same point when he describes "the unlettered men and women" as "the real heroes of the movement... bringing the country back to the great wells of democracy."

Who gets in office matters. But we need a citizen movement for deepened democracy that challenges continuing racism, as part of a politics of democratic respect for the talents and potential of citizens of every race and creed.

Harry C. Boyte is editor of Democracy's Education: Public Work, Citizenship, and the Future of Colleges and Universities (Vanderbilt University Press, 2015). The contributors give examples of a "politics of democratic respect" reappearing in higher education.

So Much Depends Upon

In 1938 William Carlos Williams published the now-famous poem The Red Wheelbarrow:

so much depends
upon

a red wheel
barrow

glazed with rain
water

beside the white
chickens

In high school classrooms across the country, students are analyzing the poem, wondering just what depends on that wheelbarrow, thinking about man’s reliance on nature or, perhaps, man’s dominance of nature. Thinking about a circle of life, a circle of dependence or, perhaps, a cycle of interdependence.

so much depends
upon

I love that line.

I imagine The Red Wheelbarrow as one man’s poem. A farmer, perhaps, thinking about the tools and nature that sustain his life. One man’s poem for one moment in time.

But we each might have our own poems.

so much depends
upon

a young
girl

stomping in the
puddles

Or perhaps…

so much depends
upon

a long red
worm

stretching through rain
water

Any moment can be miraculous. Perhaps every moment is miraculous.

Without any one moment, without one simple moment, the world is a different place. Shifted slightly. Not quite the same. Every moment matters.

so much depends
upon

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditlinkedintumblrmail