Steve Brigham Interview from NCDD Seattle

At the 2012 NCDD national conference in Seattle, NCDD member and filmmaker Jeffrey Abelson sat down with over a dozen leaders in our community to ask them about their work and their hopes and concerns for our field and for democratic governance in our country.

Today we’re featuring the interview with Steve Brigham, President of AmericaSpeaks. An organizational member of NCDD and one of our founding members back in 2002, AmericaSpeaks supported NCDD Seattle by co-sponsoring the conference.

AmericaSpeaks is a Washington, D.C.-based non-partisan, non-profit organization whose mission is to “engage citizens in the public decisions that impact their lives.” AmericaSpeaks’ work is focused on trying to create opportunities for citizens to impact decisions and to encourage public officials to make informed, lasting decisions. AmericaSpeaks has developed and facilitated deliberative methods such as the 21st Century Town Hall Meeting, which enables facilitated discussion for 500 to 5,000 participants. Its partners have included regional planning groups, local, state, and national government bodies, national and international organizations. Issues have ranged from Social Security reform, the redevelopment of ground zero in New York and rebuilding New Orleans.

See the “NCDD 2012” tag for more videos from NCDD Seattle, which brought together 400 leaders and innovators in our field. You can also check out Jeffrey Abelson’s Song of a Citizen YouTube channel and our NCDD 2012 Seattle playlist on YouTube.

Going Public: The American Commonwealth

In a recent "woman on the street" interview on PBS, a run-up to the election for governor in Virginia, the prospective voter repeatedly invoked the phrase, "the state of our commonwealth." Virginia, like three other states, is officially a commonwealth.

Perhaps the woman's phrase is also a sign of the times -- that people are worried about "the commonwealth," in a time of rancorous divisions and a culture of private pursuits. For our nation's founders, commonwealth meant not only popular government but also the public world shared by all, for which all have responsibility.

Indeed, one feature of groups like RESULTS and the Citizen Climate Lobby, citizen-based policy efforts which I recently wrote about, is the way they help people move from therapeutic and private questions like "how do I feel?" to public ones like "how can I be effective on an important issue?" They answer a hunger among the people.

Today in America we need a new story in which diverse people can see themselves, countering the false notions that making money, meritocratic success, and other private goods are the only aims in life. The commonwealth is such a story, that needs to be revitalized. Experiences some years ago of house boaters in Seattle who saved their houseboats and helped to birth the environmental movement, offer some lessons.

Terry Pettus, a talented journalist and grassroots community organizer, moved to Seattle in the 1920s. Over the next two decades he was a leading figure in many popular movements, from labor organizing to fights for public utilities and old age pensions. Pettus was shaped by the populist politics of the New Deal, a pluralistic politics that birthed the community organizing tradition which later schooled Barack Obama.

In the mid-1930s, Pettus helped to organize the Washington Commonwealth Federation, a political group of labor unions, farming communities, cooperatives, small businesses, and neighborhood organizations. By the 1940s, the Commonwealth Federation held a majority of seats in the state legislature.

As I noted in my book, Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life:

"Pettus and his wife Berta lived in a freewheeling houseboat community on Lake Union, near downtown. Boatyard workers, sailors, students, poor people, and bohemians mingled with retired radicals from the Industrial Workers of the World. Along the shore, speakeasies and brothels were scattered through small shacks and apartments."


City officials had always disapproved of the community. In 1962 they moved to dismantle the houseboats to make room for high-rise lake-front apartments and other developments. Their complaint against the house boaters was the sewage they dumped in the lake, though the boaters' sewage was a minuscule one half of one percent of the total sewage being dumped.

Few thought that the iconoclastic individualists of Lake Union could be organized, but Pettus knew they could. "People will fight for their existence, if not for abstractions," he told me. He and others formed the Floating Homes Association to solidify the community and they tied their concrete self-interest to an ideal to which everyone could relate.

Most importantly, they redefined the issue from survival of the houseboats to the meaning of progress. Was the Puget Sound only to become a "space age" consumer paradise, symbolized by the Space Needle, or was it a space for a far deeper way of life. "We knew we could never win if the issue was only the survival of the house boats," said Pettus.

Drawing on the commonwealth legacy, Pettus and his neighbors portrayed Lake Union as the embodiment of the commonwealth for and by the people of Seattle, "a gift to us from the Ice Age," as he put it. To make the point they turned the complaint against the house boaters for pollution on its head. "I knew we could never win by debating percentages, claiming 'less responsibility' for pollution than others," said Pettus.

To the consternation of city officials, house boaters demanded that they be permitted to pay for sewer lines to their boats. The association held workshops on welding pipes and hooking up lines. They gained allies like the city's Health Department.

They also organized on multiple levels. House boaters encouraged sympathetic journalists to write articles on the lake and its history in magazines and newspapers. Working with school teachers, they sponsored history tours of the lake. They held neighborhood festivals. They launched an aggressive speaking campaign across the city. They won support from faculty and students in urban planning at the University of Washington.

Throughout, their message connected the lake and its history with work, arguing Lake Union always had been a "working lake," built by the people of the city, that had multiple uses: recreation, commerce, residence, as well as a site of beauty and rest, and a place of sacred meaning for native peoples. The organizing effort tapped deep unease about the environment, and gave it shape in a different narrative of "the good life."

Thus the fate of the house boats acquired enormous symbolic significance. It became a choice between unreflective consumer culture and the commonwealth.

By late 1963, city officials were forced to respond. A city study group called for protection of the lake. The Floating Homes Association was able to block industrial uses, pressing the city to acquire a large area for a public park. The state legislature passed the strongest shoreline management legislation in the country. Pettus, who had been jailed under the Smith Act as a "subversive" in the 1950s, helped to write the legislation.

The organizing effort had contagion effects which continued for many years. "Seattle had a major era of citizen participation," said James Ellis a prestigious lawyer who was sometimes called "the informal leader of the city's elite." As a result, Ellis believed, "there was an incredible flowering in the city."

The lesson of Lake Union remains relevant.

Civic revitalization is needed inside institutions and also beyond them, in renewing concern for the shared public world. We need to remember that the American promise is a commonwealth democracy, built and sustained by the labors of all.

strange lives

I surf Wikipedia looking for interesting stories, so you don’t have to. For instance:

Charles deRudio/Carlo di Rudio is born an Italian aristocrat in 1832. After fighting for Italian unification, he flees the country and is shipwrecked off Spain. We next meet him living in East London with his Cockney wife Eliza. In 1858, he is one of several men who throw innovative, mercury-based bombs at the Emperor Napoleon III, killing eight people but not harming the monarch. DiRudio is sentenced to be guillotined but spared and sent instead to the notorious Devil’s Island, off today’s Suriname. He escapes from there and immigrates to the US. During the Civil War, he serves as a Second Lieutenant, commanding Black troops. He stays in the US Army after the war and fights in the Battle of Little Binghorn, at which George Custer and most of his men are killed. DeRudio and one other man survive by hiding in a copse for 36 hours while Lakota women attack the bodies of the US Cavalry. DeRudio dies in Pasadena in 1910.

An anonymous Irish monk works at Reichenau Abbey, now in Alpine Germany, during the 9th century. He writes a poem in Old Irish about his companionable cat, Pangur Bán, which is translated by W.H. Auden and Seamus Heaney, among others, and set to music by Samuel Barber.

In 1943, Hans Robert Lichtenberg is born to the chief of police of wartime Frankfurt. In 1980, at age 36, he is adopted by Princess Marie-Auguste of Anhalt, daughter-in-law of the late and deposed German Emperor Wilhelm II. There are allegations that the adoption, which makes him “Prinz von Anhalt,” is arranged for cash. At age 43, he marries the 69-year old Zsa Zsa Gabor. They adopt three grown men, who inherit various titles. In 2007, three women allegedly approach “Prinz von Anhalt,” ask to pose in a picture with him, pull out guns, and steal his Rolls-Royce, jewelry, wallet, and all his clothes, leaving him naked when the police arrive. In 2010, he runs for Governor of California.

The king of India learns that his son Josaphat is planning to become a Christian. He isolates him from the world, but a Christian hermit saint named Barlaam gets access to Josaphat and converts him. The king relents and abdicates in favor of Josaphat who, after reigning for some time, leaves with Barlaam to become a wandering saint. In all probability, this is actually the foundational Buddhist story of Siddhartha Gautama, translated from Sanskrit into Persian (by Manicheans), which is then translated into Arabic as the “Book of Bilawhar and Yudasaf,” which influences the Georgian Orthodox and Catholic churches to recognize a pair of saints. The Sanskrit title bodhisattva (saint) probably becomes the name Josaphat by way of “bodisav” in Persian, Budhasaf or Yudasaf in Arabic, Iodasaph in Georgian, Iodasaph in Greek, and lastly Josaphat in Latin.

The post strange lives appeared first on Peter Levine.

Group Decision Tip: Discipline

In principle, discipline is remembering what I want.

Step one of course is to figure out what I want. That’s hard all by itself. Yet without a clear definition of the goal, discipline is impossible. Chasing fleeting aspirations willy-nilly often results in a random undisciplined path that amounts to little progress.

Group Decision Tips IconStep two is to stay on the path, remember what I want, where I want to be. It is so easy to be distracted. Disciplined people have learned how to resist distraction.

Step three is do the work. And the work is surprisingly easy, even fun, when you truly believe in a well-defined goal and when you are free from distraction.

And it’s the same for groups. This is why it is so important for groups to define their goals and honor their processes that are designed to get them there.

Practical tip: Define what you want. Remember what you want. Do the work, joyfully, that will get you what you want.

free expression in our schools

(Washington, DC) This is an audio podcast of me talking with Frank LoMonte, Executive Director of The Student Press Law Center, who defends free expression in schools. Frank and I discussed the Commission on Youth Voting and Civic Knowledge and its recent report “All Together Now: Collaboration and Innovation for Youth Engagement.” The report is relevant to the First Amendment concerns of the Student Press Law Center because it emphasizes “free expression and civil deliberation” (p. 24-25) as essential aspects of civic education:

Young people need the space and encouragement to form and refine their own positions on political issues, even if their views happen to be controversial. Adults, schools, political officials, and youth themselves must adopt a generally tolerant and welcoming attitude toward this process of developing and expressing a political identity.

In the National Youth Survey, discussions of current issues predicted greater electoral engagement. We also find that when parents encouraged their adolescent children to express opinions and disagreements, these young people had higher electoral engagement, political knowledge, and informed voting in 2012. Teachers in our Teacher Survey put a high priority on civic discussion.

Just as young people must be free to adopt and express their own views, they must also be taught and expected to interact with peers and older citizens in ways that involve genuinely understanding alternative views, learning from these discussions, and collaborating on common goals.

In the podcast, Frank and I discuss the serious obstacles to this kind of education–unhelpful tests and standards, parental resistance, a caustic media environment–and how to overcome them.

The post free expression in our schools appeared first on Peter Levine.

Int’l Course on Participatory Methods in India, Spring 2014

This post was submitted by NCDD member Varun Vidyarthi of the Manavodaya Institute of Participatory Development via our Submit-to-Blog Form. Do you have field news you want to share with the rest of us? Just click here to submit your news post for the NCDD Blog!

manavodaya

You’re invited to participate in a two-week program titled “People Based Development – Concept and Practice” is a unique experience in participatory development in India. It combines inputs in classroom with field visits involving direct interaction with villagers. This will be the seventeenth international course at the Manavodaya Institute that is known for its pioneering contribution to the self help movement in India.

The program is based on the following lessons learned at Manavodaya:

  • Participatory development is a process that builds on people’s own capacity and resources and it can be initiated by outsiders through deep dialogue.
  • The process of participatory development is feasible even among the very poor and illiterate.
  • A successful participatory development process requires a clear vision, strategy, and suitable values among facilitators of the process.
  • Participants from earlier programs have used the method among refugees in Norway as well as people with learning disabilities in the UK.

For more info about Manavodaya’s work you can find their website at www.manavodaya.org.in, visit Manavodaya’s Facebook page, or check out their informative and inspiring video below: