<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/the-self-defeating-victory-of-violence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>What should we say when we talk about guns? (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[better gun debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan braman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Kahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Stalemate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people will say that they&#8217;re unnecessary and dangerous. Others will say that they&#8217;re a tool for self-defense and self-sufficiency. That&#8217;s usually where the debate rests, except that the 2nd Amendment privileges the second group. If we want to make progress, we can offer better reasons, reasons that will be superior precisely because they are &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/17/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When we finally start talking about gun control, what should we say?</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing What's Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love policy discussions, but the demands for policy discussion on gun control after the shootings in Newtown today are terribly wrong-headed. The problem is that demanding a policy discussion is not the same thing as having a policy discussion. At this point, we&#8217;re just talking about talking about gun control. It&#8217;s all &#8220;mention&#8221; and &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/14/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“The purpose of law enforcement, with respect to transactional crimes, is to make sure that they have ‘good’ criminals.”</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/the-purpose-of-law-enforcement-with-respect-to-transactional-crimes-is-to-make-sure-that-they-have-good-criminals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/the-purpose-of-law-enforcement-with-respect-to-transactional-crimes-is-to-make-sure-that-they-have-good-criminals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daniel Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felbab Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanda Felbab Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keith Humphreys shares this interview with&#160;Vanda Felbab-Brown. There are no dull moments, but here&#8217;s one I think should give us lefties pause: what will replace the underground marijuana economy? Felbab-Brown explains: Most of the time governments tend to fight illicit economies and not think about what will replace them. Policies are often premised on the erroneous idea that simply suppressing a particular part of the illicit economy will mean that legality will emerge. Frequently that does not happen, especially when large segments of the population cannot participate in the legal economy and are dependent on illegality for their survival. In those cases in particular, the propensity towards shifting to other forms of illegality is very high.&#160;On the other hand, if you have a finite&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/the-purpose-of-law-enforcement-with-respect-to-transactional-crimes-is-to-make-sure-that-they-have-good-criminals/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/11/the-purpose-of-law-enforcement-with-respect-to-transactional-crimes-is-to-make-sure-that-they-have-good-criminals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on my Crime and Punishment Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammatical Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kleiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Pettit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Vannatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That There May Be Any Future At all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Ought to Be a Law...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This semester I taught a course on crime and punishment, and in part out of competition with my colleague Seth Vannatta, I set out to give a final presentation on the dimensions of the course. This is the presentation I wrote. Introduction Our task was to explore the role of ethics in the law, and we began our semester worrying about standard ethical questions of responsibility and who to blame when things go wrong. The standard theories of punishment all revolve around these questions: whether we are utilitarians or contractarians, we are implicitly depending upon an account of what we owe to the criminal and to society. What&#8217;s more, the same assumptions underwrite our theories of what it is to deserve a grade&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/02/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
