<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Technology for Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/technology-for-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Harnessing Collaborative Technologies: Helping Funders Work Together Better</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8620</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8620#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Heierbacher]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 and social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2013, Monitor Institute and the&#160;Foundation Center&#160;released a new report called&#160;Harnessing Collaborative Technologies: Helping Funders Work Together Better. As part of the research, we looked at more than 170 different technological tools now available to funders, dove deeply into the literature on philanthropic collaboration, analyzed the results of recent Foundation Center surveys, and spoke with a wide range of experts from the worlds of both technology and philanthropy. The&#160;Harnessing Collaborative Technologies&#160;report helps readers make sense of the dizzying array of technologies that are now [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8620">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/11/15/harnessing-collaborative-technologies-helping-funders-work-together-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>e-Deliberation™</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NCDD Community]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e-Deliberation&#8482; is a web-based platform used by teams and communities to collaboratively deliberate to resolve a focus, which can be a complex problems or a goal. The teams include a rich variety of stakeholder perspectives (between 15 and 80 participants) who all contribute to define a consent-based, strategy to address the said focus. The strategy develops as several complementary vectors which are integrated and harmonized as part of the process. e-Deliberation&#8482; can be used for face to face summits as well as entirely web-based collaborations. [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/09/25/e-deliberation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rulemaking 2.0:  Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Breese]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies & Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 and social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=7877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This 2013 report from the&#160;IBM Center for The Business of Government&#160;is based on five case studies of e-rulemaking experiments to better engage the public, and offers advice on how agencies can increase the quantity and quality of public participation. By authors Cynthia R.Farina and Mary J.Newhart with CeRI (the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative). From Center Executive Director Dan Chenok&#8217;s announcement:&#160; This report provides important insights in how governments can improve the rulemaking process by taking full advantage of Rulemaking 2.0 technology, building on the progress made ... <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/08/01/rulemaking-2-0-understanding-and-getting-better-public-participation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
