<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; stakeholder engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/stakeholder-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Trainer’s Manual: Getting the Most from a Collaborative Process</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8896</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8896#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Heierbacher]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuals & Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Manual from the Policy Consensus Institute contains the essential information for training leaders from agencies and organizations interested in learning more about how to use collaborative processes to address public issues. These materials are practical and problem-centered, designed to capitalize on people&#8217;s experience and to help them integrate new ideas with their existing knowledge. They are presented in eight modules, each module covering an aspect of the &#8220;best practices&#8221; for sponsoring, organizing, and conducting a collaborative governance process. Each module includes descriptions of key [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8896">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/04/15/trainers-manual-getting-the-most-from-a-collaborative-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>e-Deliberation™</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NCDD Community]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e-Deliberation&#8482; is a web-based platform used by teams and communities to collaboratively deliberate to resolve a focus, which can be a complex problems or a goal. The teams include a rich variety of stakeholder perspectives (between 15 and 80 participants) who all contribute to define a consent-based, strategy to address the said focus. The strategy develops as several complementary vectors which are integrated and harmonized as part of the process. e-Deliberation&#8482; can be used for face to face summits as well as entirely web-based collaborations. [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/09/25/e-deliberation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rulemaking 2.0:  Understanding and Getting Better Public Participation</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Breese]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies & Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open gov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 and social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=7877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This 2013 report from the&#160;IBM Center for The Business of Government&#160;is based on five case studies of e-rulemaking experiments to better engage the public, and offers advice on how agencies can increase the quantity and quality of public participation. By authors Cynthia R.Farina and Mary J.Newhart with CeRI (the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative). From Center Executive Director Dan Chenok&#8217;s announcement:&#160; This report provides important insights in how governments can improve the rulemaking process by taking full advantage of Rulemaking 2.0 technology, building on the progress made ... <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7877">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/08/01/rulemaking-2-0-understanding-and-getting-better-public-participation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
