<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; science &amp; technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/science-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why and When Should We Use Public Deliberation?</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11205</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11205#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy dispute resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The five-page article, Why and When Should We Use Public Deliberation?,&#160;written by Stephanie Solomon and Julia Abelson, was published 2012 in the Hastings Center Report. In the article, Solomon and Abelson discuss the role of public deliberation in public policy decision-making. Public deliberation is an alternative process to determine public policy and can be a more effective method of creating policy than other familiar methods;&#160;depending on the circumstances of the issues, the level of engagement desired, and the needs of the community. Public deliberation can [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11205">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/07/27/why-and-when-should-we-use-public-deliberation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Issues Associated With Social Media (ILG Report)</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9074</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9074#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NCDD Community]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech for Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 and social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=9074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What legal issues do public agencies face relating to their use of social media? &#160;This paper chronicles a number of them. It also offers &#8220;dos and don&#8217;ts&#8221; advice for reaping the benefits of social media while minimizing the pitfalls. &#160;A version of this paper was delivered to the May 2010 City Attorneys Spring Conference. from the guide&#8217;s Introduction.. Social media has transformed communication through Internet technologies that allow users to communicate directly with each other. A key consequence of this is that traditional institutions (for [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9074">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/08/24/legal-issues-associated-with-social-media-ilg-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>e-Deliberation™</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NCDD Community]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stakeholder engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology for Engagement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[e-Deliberation&#8482; is a web-based platform used by teams and communities to collaboratively deliberate to resolve a focus, which can be a complex problems or a goal. The teams include a rich variety of stakeholder perspectives (between 15 and 80 participants) who all contribute to define a consent-based, strategy to address the said focus. The strategy develops as several complementary vectors which are integrated and harmonized as part of the process. e-Deliberation&#8482; can be used for face to face summits as well as entirely web-based collaborations. [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8455">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/09/25/e-deliberation-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sciencewise Expert Research Centre</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7846</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7846#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 23:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Heierbacher]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notable Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations & Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science & technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.K.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=7846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sciencewise-ERC is the UK's national centre for public dialogue in policy making involving science and technology issues. It provides co-funding and specialist advice and support to Government departments and agencies to develop and commission public dialogue activities in emerging areas of science and technology. <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/7846">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/07/14/sciencewise-expert-research-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
