Civic Studies » science, technology and society

what is a brute fact?

Peter — Fri, 27 Mar 2026 13:28:51 +0000

During the twenties, so a story goes, [the former Prime Minister of France, Georges] Clemenceau, shortly before his death, found himself engaged in a friendly talk with a representative of the Weimar Republic on the question of guilt for the outbreak of the First World. War. “What, in your opinion,” Clemenceau was asked, “will future […] Continue reading →

can AI solve “wicked problems”?

Peter — Thu, 12 Feb 2026 18:15:37 +0000

I’ve been reading predictions that artificial intelligence will wipe out swaths of jobs–see Josh Tyrangiel in The Atlantic or Jan Tegze. Meanwhile, this week, I’m teaching Rittel & Webber (1973), the classic article that coined the phrase “wicked problems.” I started to wonder whether AI can ever resolve wicked problems. If not, the best way […] Continue reading →

why policy debates continue

Peter — Fri, 12 Dec 2025 17:38:23 +0000

I’m at Stanford today to discuss a paper, Policy Models as Networks of Beliefs. After circulating my draft, I realized that the following is really my argument. … We use mental models to think about and discuss contested questions of policy. Worthy models typically have these features: I believe this account supports a pluralistic, polycentric, […] Continue reading →

Cezanne’s portait of Gustave Geffroy

Peter — Fri, 04 Oct 2024 12:40:32 +0000

In “Cézanne’s Doubt” (1946), Maurice Merleau-Ponty discusses Paul Cézanne’s portrait of the critic Paul Geffroy (1895-6), which led me to some congruent reflections. Merleau-Ponty notes that the table “stretches, contrary to the laws of perspective, into the lower part of the picture.” In a photograph of M. Geffroy, the table’s edges would form parallel lines […]

The post Cezanne’s portait of Gustave Geffroy appeared first on Peter Levine.

Continue reading →

how thinking about causality affects the inner life

Peter — Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:17:57 +0000

For many centuries, hugely influential thinkers in each of the Abrahamic faiths combined their foundational belief in an omnipotent deity with Aristotle’s framework of four kinds of causes. Many believers found solace when they discerned a divine role in the four causes. Aristotle’s framework ran afoul of the Scientific Revolution. Today, there are still ways […]

The post how thinking about causality affects the inner life appeared first on Peter Levine.

Continue reading →