<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Trump, Trust, and Civic Renewal</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/trump-trust-and-civic-renewal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/trump-trust-and-civic-renewal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than anything else, the current political climate shifts the kinds of solutions for which our fellow citizens will reach. Rather than hoping to make change at the national level, we must organize our political lives around more local efforts. Rather than seeking assistance from state institutions we must organize and act ourselves. I have seen four  specific projects suggested that I'd like to endorse. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/trump-trust-and-civic-renewal/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/01/25/trump-trust-and-civic-renewal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice and Consent</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/advice-and-consent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/advice-and-consent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;To what purpose then require the co-operation of the Senate? I answer, that the necessity of their concurrence would have a powerful, though, in general, a silent operation. It would be an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the President, and would tend greatly to prevent the appointment of unfit characters from State &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/advice-and-consent/">Continue reading <span>Advice and Consent</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/01/advice-and-consent/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/01/18/advice-and-consent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Risks of Public Engagement, Part I</title>
		<link>http://ericthomasweber.org/the-risks-of-public-engagement-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://ericthomasweber.org/the-risks-of-public-engagement-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[etweber@gmail.com]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Untenured]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ericthomasweber.org/?p=1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I and others may well be guilty of romanticizing public philosophy. Fellow Dewey scholar and a prolific writer, Shane Ralston, has published a warning for people interested in engaging in public philosophy. In &#8220;On the Perils of Public Philosophy,&#8221; Ralston rightly recognizes both that there is a resurgence in the movement for publicly engaged philosophy [&#8230;] <a href="http://ericthomasweber.org/the-risks-of-public-engagement-part-i/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/12/07/the-risks-of-public-engagement-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margalit and Derrida on Forgiveness and the Skandalon</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2015/07/margalit-and-derrida-on-forgiveness-and-the-skandalon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2015/07/margalit-and-derrida-on-forgiveness-and-the-skandalon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avishai Magalit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forgiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacques Derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maimonides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skandalon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=4710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I see it, the limit of forgiveness is not within our voluntary power, an act of will, but rather in developing the capacity to imagine the act that we are trying to forgive. Thus the skandalon of forgiveness is an imaginative challenge, we stumble over it when acts are unimaginable, and we overleap it when our imagination succeeds. We make these imagined acts meaningful for others through poiesis: we create a world of meaning in which they are imaginable by marking exemplars, noting commonalities, and creating spaces of remembrance. The product of our work thus makes these meaningless deaths and thought-defying atrocities meaningful and thinkable. If you think about it from the perspective of un-consolable resentment, this is a crime akin to justification or exoneration. &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2015/07/margalit-and-derrida-on-forgiveness-and-the-skandalon/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2015/07/margalit-and-derrida-on-forgiveness-and-the-skandalon/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2015/07/06/margalit-and-derrida-on-forgiveness-and-the-skandalon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going Upstream: Prisons and the Social Determinants of Health</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/05/going-upstream-prisons-and-the-social-determinants-of-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/05/going-upstream-prisons-and-the-social-determinants-of-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[David Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johns Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of weeks ago,&#160;I joined with hundreds of other students and scholars at Johns Hopkins for a conference on prisons and the social determinants of&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/05/going-upstream-prisons-and-the-social-determinants-of-health/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/05/12/going-upstream-prisons-and-the-social-determinants-of-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the ruling ideas today? Is “College For All” among them? (Doubts-that-don’t-change-our-practices edition)</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/01/what-are-the-ruling-ideas-today-is-college-for-all-among-them-doubts-that-dont-change-our-practices-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/01/what-are-the-ruling-ideas-today-is-college-for-all-among-them-doubts-that-dont-change-our-practices-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college wage premium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just finished an article on higher education and the liberal arts, and it&#8217;s full of hope and comes to some definite conclusions about particular ways&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/01/what-are-the-ruling-ideas-today-is-college-for-all-among-them-doubts-that-dont-change-our-practices-edition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/01/17/what-are-the-ruling-ideas-today-is-college-for-all-among-them-doubts-that-dont-change-our-practices-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we say when we talk about guns? (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[better gun debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan braman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Kahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Stalemate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people will say that they&#8217;re unnecessary and dangerous. Others will say that they&#8217;re a tool for self-defense and self-sufficiency. That&#8217;s usually where the debate rests, except that the 2nd Amendment privileges the second group. If we want to make progress, we can offer better reasons, reasons that will be superior precisely because they are &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/17/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on my Crime and Punishment Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammatical Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kleiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Pettit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Vannatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That There May Be Any Future At all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Ought to Be a Law...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This semester I taught a course on crime and punishment, and in part out of competition with my colleague Seth Vannatta, I set out to give a final presentation on the dimensions of the course. This is the presentation I wrote. Introduction Our task was to explore the role of ethics in the law, and we began our semester worrying about standard ethical questions of responsibility and who to blame when things go wrong. The standard theories of punishment all revolve around these questions: whether we are utilitarians or contractarians, we are implicitly depending upon an account of what we owe to the criminal and to society. What&#8217;s more, the same assumptions underwrite our theories of what it is to deserve a grade&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/02/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
