<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Reactive Attitudes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/reactive-attitudes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 17:42:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Self-Esteem and the Death of the Subject</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/02/self-esteem-and-the-death-of-the-subject/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/02/self-esteem-and-the-death-of-the-subject/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Albert Ellis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Mills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[status emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=4949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written here repeatedly about the problems with person-oriented reactive attitudes and character skepticism. But recently I came across the work&#160;of the psychologist Albert Ellis, whose work is at the intersection of therapeutic psychology and philosophy. His work on self-esteem and person-oriented assessment suggests an interesting new direction for the general insight that we &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/02/self-esteem-and-the-death-of-the-subject/">Continue reading <span>Self-Esteem and the Death of the Subject</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/02/self-esteem-and-the-death-of-the-subject/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/02/26/self-esteem-and-the-death-of-the-subject/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on my Crime and Punishment Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammatical Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kleiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Pettit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Vannatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That There May Be Any Future At all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Ought to Be a Law...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This semester I taught a course on crime and punishment, and in part out of competition with my colleague Seth Vannatta, I set out to give a final presentation on the dimensions of the course. This is the presentation I wrote. Introduction Our task was to explore the role of ethics in the law, and we began our semester worrying about standard ethical questions of responsibility and who to blame when things go wrong. The standard theories of punishment all revolve around these questions: whether we are utilitarians or contractarians, we are implicitly depending upon an account of what we owe to the criminal and to society. What&#8217;s more, the same assumptions underwrite our theories of what it is to deserve a grade&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/02/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
