<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; random selection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/random-selection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding Participant Representativeness in Deliberative Events</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9895</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9895#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies & Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=9895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case study, Understanding Participant Representativeness in Deliberative Events: A Case Study Comparing Probability and Non-Probability Recruitment Strategies, by&#160;Jamie Griffin,&#160;Tarik Abdel-Monem,&#160;Alan Tomkins,&#160;Amanda Richardson, and&#160;Stacia Jorgensen, was published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 11: Iss. 1. This case study examines participant representativeness within deliberative events and then reviews two public participation processes in Lincoln, Nebraska. From the Abstract Deliberative event participants often differ in meaningful ways from the population they are intended to represent; however, less is known about whether various recruitment methods influence participant [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/9895">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2015/06/19/understanding-participant-representativeness-in-deliberative-events/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
