<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Program Evaluations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/program-evaluations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How are WE Doing? A Public Engagement Evaluation Platform</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11614</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11614#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 14:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutionalizing D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online & hi-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program Evaluations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In June 2016, the Davenport Institute&#160;released,&#160;How are WE Doing? A Public Engagement Evaluation Platform, which was&#160;designed for public leaders to evaluate their public engagement processes and/or apply to be recognized as a &#8220;publicly engaged city&#8221; on a silver, gold, or platinum level. The Davenport Institute offers support to officials looking to engage their public better; and offer training and resources to help improve this process. Below describes how the platform works, the way it was designed, and the support provided by the Davenport Institute. You [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11614">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/03/06/how-are-we-doing-a-public-engagement-evaluation-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Dialogue to Action: Climate Dialogues and Climate Action Labs</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8547</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8547#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 00:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Heierbacher]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case Studies & Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dialogue to action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environ sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EvDem/Study Circles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program Evaluations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This 2008 article by Phil Mitchell shows how a global issue like climate change can be handled gracefully at the local level with little funds by working in collaboration with the existing infrastructure provided by local environmental organizations. (Vol 2 Issue 2 of the International Journal of Public Participation, December 2008) Abstract: The Greater Seattle Climate Dialogues is a climate change education and advocacy project with its roots in dialogue and deliberation. Using an adapted study circles model, the purpose of its Climate Action Labs [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8547">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/10/03/from-dialogue-to-action-climate-dialogues-and-climate-action-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
