<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Political Theory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/political-theory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>How the Schocken Books collections changed Arendt scholarship</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/09/how-the-schocken-books-collections-changed-arendt-scholarship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/09/how-the-schocken-books-collections-changed-arendt-scholarship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bard College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holloway Sparks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerome Kohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machete order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schocken Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt never wrote a "moral philosophy." It is not hidden away in the archives or any of the recent collections of her work, nor in her unpublished lectures, letters, or journals. She was a political theorist who thought that moral philosophy requires a set of social relations that are inaccessible in the modern world. Yet as she has become more popular and is taught more and more often by moral philosophers, she is developing an unearned reputation as a moralist that perverts both what we should mean by moral philosophy and what she hoped to show us about the world we now inhabit. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/09/how-the-schocken-books-collections-changed-arendt-scholarship/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/09/25/how-the-schocken-books-collections-changed-arendt-scholarship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on my Crime and Punishment Seminar</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grammatical Theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Kleiman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michel Foucault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Pettit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reactive Attitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Vannatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strawson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That There May Be Any Future At all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[There Ought to Be a Law...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; This semester I taught a course on crime and punishment, and in part out of competition with my colleague Seth Vannatta, I set out to give a final presentation on the dimensions of the course. This is the presentation I wrote. Introduction Our task was to explore the role of ethics in the law, and we began our semester worrying about standard ethical questions of responsibility and who to blame when things go wrong. The standard theories of punishment all revolve around these questions: whether we are utilitarians or contractarians, we are implicitly depending upon an account of what we owe to the criminal and to society. What&#8217;s more, the same assumptions underwrite our theories of what it is to deserve a grade&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/02/reflections-on-my-crime-and-punishment-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
