<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Participatory Budgeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/participatory-budgeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 13:44:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The haves and the have-nots: who benefits from civic tech?</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2022/10/20/the-haves-and-the-have-nots-who-benefits-from-civic-tech/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2022/10/20/the-haves-and-the-have-nots-who-benefits-from-civic-tech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 11:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital divide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictors of participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Civic tech&#8221; broadly refers to the use of digital technologies to support a range of citizen engagement processes.&#160;From allowing individuals to report problems to local government to enabling the crowdsourcing of national legislation, civic tech aims to promote better policies &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2022/10/20/the-haves-and-the-have-nots-who-benefits-from-civic-tech/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2022/10/20/the-haves-and-the-have-nots-who-benefits-from-civic-tech/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2022/10/20/the-haves-and-the-have-nots-who-benefits-from-civic-tech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b970c8504e1da3a07e2a7d92a7e33676d0c3024743c5230f6346a81c703cd572?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/lewis-nguyen-e8prgd7h-5w-unsplash2.jpg?w=812" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>46 favorite reads on democracy, civic tech and a few other interesting things</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sortition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been exchanging with some friends on a list of favorite reads from 2020. While I started with a short list, it quickly grew: after all, despite the pandemic, there has been lots of interesting stuff published in the &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1457369804613-52c61a468e7d?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&#038;ixid=MXwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHw=&#038;auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1000&#038;q=80" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Research on Participatory Governance and Tax Compliance</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy councils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue mobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the World Bank, we have published two new studies on the effect of citizen engagement on tax morale and tax compliance. In the first, published last month, we examine the Brazilian case, using data from all 5,570 municipalities in &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/bureaucracy_files_tax_consultant_2-1.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techniques and Technologies for Mobilizing Citizens: Do They Work?</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2017/11/15/techniques-and-technologies-for-mobilizing-citizens-do-they-work/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2017/11/15/techniques-and-technologies-for-mobilizing-citizens-do-they-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experiment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[get-out-the-vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCTs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio Grande do Sul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Techniques for mobilizing citizens to vote in elections have become highly sophisticated in large part thanks to get-out-the-vote (GOTV) research, with fascinating experimental evidence from interventions to increase turnout. Until recently, the use of these techniques has been mostly limited &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/11/15/techniques-and-technologies-for-mobilizing-citizens-do-they-work/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/11/15/techniques-and-technologies-for-mobilizing-citizens-do-they-work/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/11/15/techniques-and-technologies-for-mobilizing-citizens-do-they-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/17146073016_5657607917_z1.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catching up (again!) on DemocracySpot</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICT4D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since the last post here. In compensation, it&#8217;s not been a bad year in terms of getting some research out there. First, we finally managed to publish &#8220;Civic Tech in the Global South: Assessing Technology for &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/cover-book.png" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/clinton.png" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-police relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intergroup relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 20-page article,&#160;Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes&#160;(2016), was written by Edana Beauvais and Andre Baechtiger, and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 12: Iss. 2. The article reviews the goals of healthy deliberative systems and the different designs of civic forums, including participant recruitment, nature of interaction, and decision-making.&#160;The authors reviews research which shows evidence that the design of a deliberative system affects its outcomes and goals. Read an excerpt of the [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/05/12/taking-the-goals-of-deliberation-seriously-a-differentiated-view-on-equality-and-equity-in-deliberative-designs-and-processes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Papers Published: FixMyStreet and the World’s Largest Participatory Budgeting</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixmystreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictors of participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are two new published papers that my colleagues Jon Mellon, Fredrik Sjoberg and myself have been working on. The first, The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation, published in Public Administration Review, is &#8211; to our knowledge &#8211; &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/2016_7_5_anderson-lopes_consulta-popular_virtual.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budgeting for Equity: How Can Participatory Budgeting Advance Equity in the United States?</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11512</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11512#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 18-page article, Budgeting for Equity: How Can Participatory Budgeting Advance Equity in the United States? , was written by&#160;Madeleine Pape and Josh Lerner&#160;and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 12: Iss. 2. The article talks about the history of participatory budgeting, starting in Porto Alegre and how it has growth in the US. Two major claims of PB is that is it an opportunity to &#8220;revitalize democracy and advance equity&#8221;. Pape and Lerner share some of the challenges and strategies to equity within PB. [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11512">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/01/04/budgeting-for-equity-how-can-participatory-budgeting-advance-equity-in-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Guide to Participatory Budgeting in Schools</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11255</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11255#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2016 13:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutionalizing D&D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manuals & Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 57-page guide,&#160;A Guide to Participatory Budgeting in Schools, was a project of the Participatory Budgeting Project (PBP)&#160;and&#160;published in 2016. The guide&#8217;s curriculum design was created by Valeria Mogilevich, with project support by Melissa Appleton and Maria Hadden of PBP. This thorough guide gives details for implementing&#160;a participatory budgeting process within schools. Participatory budgeting is a process where people decide where to spend a portion of a budget by engaging their community- or in this case- their school, and vote on projects to make final [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11255">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/08/15/a-guide-to-participatory-budgeting-in-schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 Key Metrics for Evaluating Participatory Budgeting: A Toolkit for Evaluators and Implementers</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11085</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11085#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assessment Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kettering Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 29-page toolkit,&#160;15 Key Metrics for Evaluating Participatory Budgeting: A Toolkit for Evaluators and Implementers,&#160;was created in collaboration with&#160;Public Agenda (PA), the Participatory Budgeting Project (PBP), and the North American Research Board.&#160;The toolkit includes 15 metrics to capture major elements of a PB process, to support the evaluation of a specific PB site and use the data to inform the larger PB movement. Below is an excerpt from the toolkit, which you can find in full PDF, both in English and in Spanish on&#160;Public Agenda&#8217;s [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11085">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/02/15-key-metrics-for-evaluating-participatory-budgeting-a-toolkit-for-evaluators-and-implementers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
