<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Ostrom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/ostrom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:55:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Symmetry of Rival and Anti-Rival Goods</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/01/the-symmetry-of-rival-and-anti-rival-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/01/the-symmetry-of-rival-and-anti-rival-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 15:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anti-rival goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common-pool resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coordination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elinor Ostrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow shoveling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=4931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A shoveled sidewalk is a strange sort of common pool resource: it's not like fisheries or irrigation where the more one person uses the resource, the less there is for others. That is, it's not precisely "rivalrous," one of two conditions required for a common-pool resource to flourish.  In fact, the more people shovel their sidewalks, the better off each individual with a shoveled sidewalk is. This is what economists call "anti-rivalry" and is frequently linked to network effects. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/01/the-symmetry-of-rival-and-anti-rival-goods/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/01/29/the-symmetry-of-rival-and-anti-rival-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Paradox to Savor:  A High-Quality, Free Economics Textbook</title>
		<link>http://bollier.org/blog/paradox-savor-high-quality-free-economics-textbook</link>
		<comments>http://bollier.org/blog/paradox-savor-high-quality-free-economics-textbook#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bollier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open access publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostrom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civicstudies.org/?guid=830780d7e3177e3ac4b2193c4f580b77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>The economist Paul Samuelson once wrote, &#8220;I don't care who writes a nation's laws&#8212;or crafts its advanced treaties&#8212;if I can write its economics textbooks.&#8221;&#160;</p>
<p>What a pleasure to learn that an insurgent team of economists, <a href="http://core-econ.org/">The Core Project</a>, is about to rewrite the nation&#8217;s laws.&#160; The new introductory economics textbook is called <em>The Economy</em>.&#160; It is surely the most daring, cosmopolitan and empirically driven textbook since Samuelson&#8217;s tome was unleashed on undergraduates in 1948.&#160; It is also packed with innovations worthy of our digital age. The Core Project&#8217;s sardonic tagline says it well:&#160; &#8220;Teaching economics as if the last three decades had happened.&#8221;&#160;<img alt="" src="http://bollier.org/sites/default/files/u6/Screen%20Shot%202014-10-22%20at%204.48.40%20PM.png" width="284" height="312"></p>
<p>This is not your grandfather&#8217;s econ textbook.&#160; Nor is it an exercise in ideological spin or neoliberal bashing. In both style and substance, Core-Econ (the name for the Core Project's website) shakes off the dreary norms of conventional economics and embraces the critical intelligence of the real world.&#160;</p>
<p>Savor the delicious paradox that <em>The Economy </em>is published as an interactive ebook available for free downloads (pdfs) and printing. It is published under a Creative Commons Attribution, NonCommercial, NoDerivatives license, demonstrating that a free lunch <em>is</em> entirely feasible (at least for non-rival goods like books).</p>
<p>So far, ten of the twenty-one planned teaching modules have been published online; the remaining ten modules are expected to be completed by the end of 2014. At the moment, the online version is available as a &#8220;beta&#8221; release, which means that anyone can submit feedback and suggestions to improve the text before its release. </p>
<p><a href="http://bollier.org/blog/paradox-savor-high-quality-free-economics-textbook" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
 <a href="http://bollier.org/blog/paradox-savor-high-quality-free-economics-textbook">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/10/22/a-paradox-to-savor-a-high-quality-free-economics-textbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Derek Wall’s “The Commons in History”</title>
		<link>http://bollier.org/blog/derek-wall%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9C-commons-history%E2%80%9D</link>
		<comments>http://bollier.org/blog/derek-wall%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9C-commons-history%E2%80%9D#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bollier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civicstudies.org/?guid=06c9662fdab1cdc3603a69da960d2f61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>For many people, the commons exists as some sort of Platonic ideal -- a fixed, universal archetype.&#160; That&#8217;s silly, of course, because commons are so embedded in a given place and moment of history and culture, and therefore highly variable.&#160; Derek Wall takes this as a point of departure in his new book, <em>The Commons in History:&#160; Culture, Conflict and Ecology</em> (MIT Press).&#160; At 136 pages of text, it is a short and highly readable book, but one that conveys much of the texture of commons and enclosures as paradigms -- and the implications for ecosystems.<img alt="" src="http://bollier.org/sites/default/files/resize/u6/Screen%20Shot%202014-04-14%20at%203.35.21%20PM-400x578.png" width="400" height="578"></p>
<p>Wall is an economist at Goldsmith College, University of London, so he knows a few things about the biases of conventional economics.&#160; He is also a member of the Green party of England and Wales, and therefore knows a few things about corporate power and oppositional politics.&#160;</p>
<p>As the author of a recent intellectual biography, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Sustainable-Economics-Elinor-Ostrom/dp/0415641748"><em>The Sustainable Economics of Elinor Ostrom</em></a> (Routledge), Wall has a subtle mastery of Ostrom&#8217;s approach to the commons, but he is not afraid to wade into the political aspects of commons.&#160; He notes, for example, &#8220;most commons have not been found to succeed or fail on the basis of their own merits.&#160; Instead, they have been enclosed, and access has been restricted and often turned over to purely private ownership or state control.&#8221;&#160; He adds that &#8220;commons is a concept that is both contests and innately political in nature.&#160; Power and access to resources remain essential areas for debate.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is entirely appropriate, then, that Wall goes beyond the familiar Hardin-Ostrom debate on the rationality and economic value of commons, to explore what he calls &#8220;the radical case for the commons,&#8221; as outlined by E.P. Thompson and Christopher Hill, among others.&#160; While Marxist criticisms of the environmental effects of capitalism so often hit the mark, Wall points out that &#8220;the commons is not utopia.&#160; A common-pool property rights do not guarantee a free and equal society.&#8221; &#160;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s partly because a commons is not a unitary model, but only a template with highly variable outcomes.&#160; People may have common rights to use &#8220;usufruct rights&#8221; on privately owned land, for example, authorizing them to gather fallen wood.&#160; This can be considered a type of commons, albeit not one as self-sovereign and robust as those with communally owned and controlled land.&#160; Commons may also coexist with hierarchical power relationships &#8211; a reality that also militates against a radical equality.</p>
<p><a href="http://bollier.org/blog/derek-wall%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9C-commons-history%E2%80%9D" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
 <a href="http://bollier.org/blog/derek-wall%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9C-commons-history%E2%80%9D">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/04/14/derek-walls-the-commons-in-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sustaining the Commons, a Textbook Overview of Ostrom&#8217;s Research</title>
		<link>http://bollier.org/blog/sustaining-commons-textbook-overview-ostroms-research</link>
		<comments>http://bollier.org/blog/sustaining-commons-textbook-overview-ostroms-research#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bollier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ostrom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civicstudies.org/?guid=618799e09597595535062d6074fa6b5e</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>For newcomers to the commons wishing to acquaint themselves with Elinor Ostrom&#8217;s work, it can be a hard slog.&#160; Her scholarly treatises, while often quite insightful, can be quite dense in delivering their hard research results and refined insights.&#160; It is a real pleasure, therefore, to greet <em>Sustaining the Commons</em>, a new undergraduate textbook that has just been published.&#160; The book provides a general overview of the intellectual framework, concepts and applications of Ostrom&#8217;s research on the commons.&#160;</p>
<p>Best of all, in a refreshing departure from most academic publishing, the authors of the 168-page book decided to make it available for free as a downloadable pdf file.&#160; Just go to the book&#8217;s website and blog, <a href="http://sustainingthecommons.asu.edu/">http://sustainingthecommons.asu.edu</a>.</p>
<p><em>Sustaining the Commons </em>is by John M. Anderies and Marco A. Janssen, both associate professors at Arizona State University and directors of the Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, which is the publisher of the textbook.&#160; Both authors worked with Ostrom from 2000 until her death in 2012.&#160; Although Ostrom&#8217;s name is mostly associated with Indiana University, where she co-founded and ran the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ostrom was also a part-time research professor at ASU from 2006-2012.</p>
<p><img alt="" src="http://bollier.org/sites/default/files/resize/u6/Screen%20shot%202013-06-21%20at%202.39.53%20PM-350x454.png" width="350" height="454"></p>
<p>Anderies and Janssen taught a course at ASU on Ostrom&#8217;s work, with a special focus on her books <em>Governing the Commons</em> (1990) and <em>Understanding Institutional Diversity</em> (2005).&#160; Out of that teaching arose the idea for this book.&#160; Ostrom herself saw and approved of the first draft of the book in April 2012, shortly before her death.&#160;</p>
<p>The book is a lucid, logically presented introduction to the key concepts of Ostrom&#8217;s research.&#160; There are chapters on &#8220;defining institutions,&#8221; &#8220;action arenas and action situations,&#8221; and &#8220;social dilemmas.&#8221;&#160; There are also a series of case studies on the management of various types of common-pool resources &#8211; water, forests, domesticated animals &#8211; and a review of &#8220;design principles to sustain the commons.&#8221; &#160;</p>
<p>There are a number of chapters on human behavior as it is studied by social science.&#160; How do people make decisions about collective matters and how do they develop trust?&#160; How are these behaviors studied in the laboratory?&#160; What sorts of rules and social norms matter?&#160;</p>
<p></p>
<p><a href="http://bollier.org/blog/sustaining-commons-textbook-overview-ostroms-research" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
 <a href="http://bollier.org/blog/sustaining-commons-textbook-overview-ostroms-research">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/06/21/sustaining-the-commons-a-textbook-overview-of-ostroms-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
