<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Focus Group Discussions as Sites for Public Deliberation and Sensemaking Following Shared Political Documentary Viewing</title>
		<link>https://ncdd.org/rc/item/12279/</link>
		<comments>https://ncdd.org/rc/item/12279/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals & Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=12279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 27-page article, Focus Group Discussions as Sites for Public Deliberation and Sensemaking Following Shared Political Documentary Viewing&#160;(2017), was written byMargaret Jane Pitts, Kate Kenski, Stephanie A. Smith, and Corey A. Pavlich, and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 13: Iss. 2. From the abstract, &#8220;This study examines the potential that&#160;shared&#160;political documentary viewing coupled with public deliberation via focus group discussion has for political sensemaking and civic engagement&#8221;. Read an excerpt from the article below and find the PDF available for download on&#160;the Journal of [&#8230;] <a href="https://ncdd.org/rc/item/12279/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2018/04/27/focus-group-discussions-as-sites-for-public-deliberation-and-sensemaking-following-shared-political-documentary-viewing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The prism of the public sphere: The COP15 coverage by the Brazilian media system</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12040</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12040#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals & Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 and social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=12040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 30-page article,&#160;The prism of the public sphere: The COP15 coverage by the Brazilian media system (2017), was written by Di&#243;genes Lycari&#227;o and Antal Wozniak, and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 13: Iss. 1. In the article, the authors provide an analysis of the contributions media provides for the public to understand and engage with deliberative and governmental processes, as exemplified in the Brazilian coverage of the 15th UN&#8217;s Climate Change Conference (COP15). Read an excerpt of the article below and find the PDF [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12040">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2018/02/12/the-prism-of-the-public-sphere-the-cop15-coverage-by-the-brazilian-media-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Role of Experts across Two Different Arenas in a Deliberative System</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12001</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12001#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals & Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems change]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=12001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 35-page article,&#160;The Role of Experts across Two Different Arenas in a Deliberative System&#160;(2017), was written by Rousiley C. M. Maia, Marcela D. Laranjeira, and Pedro S. Mundim, and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 13: Iss. 1. In the article, the authors respond to the call to explore a deliberative systems perspective by looking at how one arena of deliberation affects another; they do this by exploring the role of experts in two distinct arenas of legislative public hearings and the media. Read an [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/12001">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2018/01/26/the-role-of-experts-across-two-different-arenas-in-a-deliberative-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Danger of a Single Story</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11492</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11492#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2016 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online & hi-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos About D&D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 18 min TedTalk,&#160;The Danger of a Single Story by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie was filmed in July 2009. In the talk, Adichie shares what she calls, &#8220;the danger of a single story&#8221; and the false understandings that can arise when only the single side of a story is heard. Adichie shows the powerful opportunity of storytelling- to hear the many different sides of a story and have a more complete understanding of a person, a situation, a reality. Below is the full talk and a [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11492">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/12/07/the-danger-of-a-single-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AllSides</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11480</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11480#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online & hi-tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizations & Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisan divide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From AllSides&#8230; Unlike regular news services, AllSides exposes bias and provides multiple angles on the same story so you can quickly get the full picture, not just one slant. At AllSides, we believe the way society gets its news and information affects the world around us. And lately it hasn&#8217;t been going well. News, social media and even search results have dramatically changed in the last several years, becoming so narrowly filtered, biased and personalized that we are becoming less informed and less tolerant of [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11480">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/12/05/allsides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KF and Journalism: On Again! Off Again! On Again! (Connections 2015)</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10840</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journals & Newsletters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kettering Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=10840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four-page article,&#160;KF and Journalism: On Again! Off Again! On Again!&#160;by David Holwerk was&#160;published Fall 2015 in Kettering Foundation&#8216;s annual newsletter, &#8220;Connections 2015 &#8211; Our History: Journeys in KF Research&#8221;. Holwerk discusses Kettering&#8217;s relationship with journalism and how over the last couple decades, the relationship has had its ups and downs. Kettering has had several active areas in journalism, especially during the 1990s emergence of the public journalism movement. Read an excerpt of the article below and find Connections 2015 available for free PDF download [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10840">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/03/16/kf-and-journalism-on-again-off-again-on-again-connections-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>@Stake: A Role-Playing Card Game</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10150</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10150#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D&D games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for beginners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools & Handouts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=10150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Engagement Lab at Emerson College created @Stake, a role-playing card game used to foster&#160;decision-making, empathy and collaboration. The players take various roles and create questions based on real life issues to deliberate&#160;on during the game. All participants pitch their ideas under a time limit and one of the players, &#8220;The Decider&#8221; will choose who has the best idea and award points. More about the game Development of @Stake: Planning issues often involve conflicting interests coupled with deep resentments and community divides. Building a new [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/10150">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2015/09/18/stake-a-role-playing-card-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Interview with Writer’s Voice about ‘Green Governance’ and ‘Viral Spiral’</title>
		<link>http://bollier.org/blog/my-interview-writer%E2%80%99s-voice-about-%E2%80%98green-governance%E2%80%99-and-%E2%80%98viral-spiral%E2%80%99</link>
		<comments>http://bollier.org/blog/my-interview-writer%E2%80%99s-voice-about-%E2%80%98green-governance%E2%80%99-and-%E2%80%98viral-spiral%E2%80%99#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bollier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commons strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civicstudies.org/?guid=35d46134464b9666831e839d17098558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="http://writersvoice.net/">Writer&#8217;s Voice</a>, a national radio show and podcast featuring authors, recently devoted <a href="http://www.writersvoice.net/2013/11/david-bollier-on-the-commons-green-governance-viral-spiral">an hour to talking with me about the commons.</a>&#160;The chief focus was on my new book co-authored with Burns Weston, <a href="http://www.commonslawproject.org/"><em>Green Governance:&#160; Ecological Survival, Human Rights and the Law of the Commons</em>,</a> which Cambridge University Press published in January.&#160;</p>
<p>Our book recovers from history many fragments of what we call &#8220;commons-based law&#8221; from such sources as Roman law, the Magna Carta and Charter of the Forest, and public trust doctrine governing natural resources. &#160;We also point to many modern-day analogues such as international treaties to manage Antarctica and space as commons. We wish to show that commons-based law is in fact a long and serious legal tradition &#8211; but one that has also been quite vulnerable, particularly over the past two centuries as market-oriented priorities have eclipsed the commons.&#160;<img alt="" src="http://bollier.org/sites/default/files/u6/Screen%20Shot%202013-11-15%20at%209.31.10%20AM.png" width="411" height="105"></p>
<p>Burns Weston and I argue that the right to a clean and healthy environment, and to access to nature for subsistence (as opposed to for profit-making market purposes), should be recognized as a human right.&#160; The right to meet one&#8217;s everyday household needs &#8211; by responsibly managing forests, pasture, orchards and wild game as a commons &#8211; was recognized by the Charter of the Forest, adopted by King Henry III, the son of King John, in 1217.</p>
<p>This right was essentially a right to survive because commoners depended on the forest for food, fuel, economic security and other basic needs. Such precedents ought to inform our discussions today, when the rights of investors and markets in effect override any human right to survival (consider the many free trade treaties that override democratic sovereignty, ecological protections and local control).</p>
<p><a href="http://bollier.org/blog/my-interview-writer%E2%80%99s-voice-about-%E2%80%98green-governance%E2%80%99-and-%E2%80%98viral-spiral%E2%80%99" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
 <a href="http://bollier.org/blog/my-interview-writer%E2%80%99s-voice-about-%E2%80%98green-governance%E2%80%99-and-%E2%80%98viral-spiral%E2%80%99">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/11/15/my-interview-with-writers-voice-about-green-governance-and-viral-spiral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integrating News Media, Citizen Engagement, and Digital Platforms Towards Democratic Ends</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8573</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8573#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy Heierbacher]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=8573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This 5-page AmericaSpeaks report examines how we might use new forms of media, digital platforms, and citizen engagement principles to&#160;reengage the center and those who have turned out due to apathy and disgust. The report discusses some of the issues that need to be considered to bring the power of new technology and the digital world to the complexity of media, citizen engagement, and politics.&#160; What needs to happen in today&#8217;s new news space to prevent many of the same structures of inequity, exclusion, and [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/8573">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/10/18/integrating-news-media-citizen-engagement-and-digital-platforms-towards-democratic-ends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deliberative democracy and the media</title>
		<link>http://deldem.weblogs.anu.edu.au/2013/02/14/deliberative-democracy-and-the-media/</link>
		<comments>http://deldem.weblogs.anu.edu.au/2013/02/14/deliberative-democracy-and-the-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon John Niemeyer]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Niemeyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deldem.weblogs.anu.edu.au/?p=1411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deliberative democracy is based on the principle that politics should be inclusive, deliberative and consequential. This means that there need to be mechanisms to ensure that all those affected by collective decisions should be able to influence the outcome and &#8230; <a href="http://deldem.weblogs.anu.edu.au/2013/02/14/deliberative-democracy-and-the-media/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://deldem.weblogs.anu.edu.au/2013/02/14/deliberative-democracy-and-the-media/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/02/14/deliberative-democracy-and-the-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
