<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; land value taxation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/land-value-taxation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why Not Tax Monopoly Rents?</title>
		<link>http://bollier.org/blog/why-not-tax-monopoly-rents</link>
		<comments>http://bollier.org/blog/why-not-tax-monopoly-rents#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bollier]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry George]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land value taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopolies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://civicstudies.org/?guid=f11c60d7461a12665ee1f0b5e289e8b1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Some interesting material coming out of <a href="http://http//www.prosper.org.au">Prosper Australia</a> is a Melbourne-based organization and its partners, <a href="http://www.earthsharing.org.au/">Earthsharing Australia</a> and the <a href="http://blog.lvrg.org.au/">Land Values Research Group</a>. &#160;A new report entitled &#8220;Total Resource Rents:&#160; Harnessing the Power of Monopoly&#8221; <a href="http://www.prosper.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/TRRA_2013_final.pdf">(pdf file)</a> finds that nearly one-quarter of Australia&#8217;s GDP comes from unearned income, not the 2% that neoclassical economists claim.&#160;</p>
<p>This means that ten times greater revenue could be raised through taxing unearned income from monopolies than previously thought.&#160; It also means that nearly half of Australia&#8217;s government revenues could be raised through channeling revenues from the real estate boom to more productive purposes.&#160; In the process, income, company and sales taxes &#8211; along with 122 other current taxes &#8211; could be eliminated.<img alt="" src="http://bollier.org/sites/default/files/resize/u6/Screen%20Shot%202013-12-13%20at%2010.05.09%20AM-350x251.png" width="350" height="251"></p>
<p>Report author Karl Fitzgerald, &#8220;the Renegade Economist,&#8221; describes the implications of the findings of the report:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Unearned incomes equate to 23.6% of GDP and could be taxed without pushing up pricing structures. Most economists dismiss economic rents at just 2% of GDP. This report finds the free lunch driving the wealth gap is ten times greater than mainstream economists acknowledge.&#160;</p>
<p>&#8220;Prices could fall by some 20% by reducing the number of taxes from 126 to 24&#8221; stated Fitzgerald. &#8220;The compliance and deadweight losses are a huge cost that fall disproportionately on small business.&#8221;&#160; This reform offers a more efficient and equitable economic system, valuing productive over speculative activities.</p>
<p>Australia taxes productive work while averting its eyes from the incredible windfall gains handed to those who own monopoly rights. Victorian abalone licenses were sold outright for just $6 in the late 1960&#8242;s. Each license can now be leased out yearly for a reported $100,000. This unearned income can be taxed without affecting productive outcomes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://bollier.org/blog/why-not-tax-monopoly-rents" target="_blank">read more</a></p>
 <a href="http://bollier.org/blog/why-not-tax-monopoly-rents">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/12/13/why-not-tax-monopoly-rents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
