<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Kristie Dotson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/kristie-dotson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Philosophical Research and Political Diversity</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/12/philosophical-research-and-political-diversity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/12/philosophical-research-and-political-diversity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily Nous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristie Dotson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=4253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insofar as we are engaged in a collective project, we must both mutually support each others' inquiry and avoid errors. These two goals are at odds: homogeneity can also lead to unchallenged motivated reasoning and thus to polarization and error. But mutual inquiry requires some degree of shared values, assumptions, and methods which make political diversity divisive and paralyzing. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/12/philosophical-research-and-political-diversity/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/12/23/philosophical-research-and-political-diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Philosophy and Normal Science: The Rankings Debate</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/09/philosophy-and-normal-science-the-rankings-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/09/philosophy-and-normal-science-the-rankings-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kristie Dotson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndey Morgenbesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommie Curry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been much discussion lately about the ranking of graduate programs in philosophy: Ed Kazarian writes &#8220;Maybe the Best Rankings are No Rankings at All,&#8221;&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2014/09/philosophy-and-normal-science-the-rankings-debate/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/09/29/philosophy-and-normal-science-the-rankings-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
