<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Friendly Fire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/friendly-fire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Pragmatism, Pluralism, and Relativism</title>
		<link>https://www.anotherpanacea.com/2025/01/24/pragmatism-pluralism-and-relativism/</link>
		<comments>https://www.anotherpanacea.com/2025/01/24/pragmatism-pluralism-and-relativism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Believing What's True]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=6744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It'd be nice if the folks who don't believe in global warming weren't polluting the same world as the folks who do, but the tragedy of existence is that we must share one world. No one sane and good is ever a relativist or a pragmatist about criminal guilt or ignorance, about child abuse and the Satanic panic, or about vaccines. Relativism is always reserved for some other stuff that&#8217;s off to the side, like whether a particular artwork is beautiful. <a href="https://www.anotherpanacea.com/2025/01/24/pragmatism-pluralism-and-relativism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/01/24/pragmatism-pluralism-and-relativism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coauthorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schliesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiery friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This piece was co-written and co-published with Eric Schliesser. The most dazzling example of co-authorship is Paul Erd&#337;s, who co-wrote more than 1400 papers in mathematics with 485 collaborators. (What is your Erd&#337;s number?) To do this, he became functionally homeless: &#8220;His modus operandi was to show up on the doorstep of a fellow mathematician, &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/07/19/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friendly Fire and Fiery Friendship: Noma Arpaly, Joseph Trullinger, and the Tenor of Philosophy Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiery friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gotthold Lessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Trullinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leigh Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noma Arpaly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too often in praise for "agonism" we tend to treat the conflicts as if they are self-justifying. Trullinger's view is that we ought to endorse the spirit of "glad to be wrong" by being particularly welcoming to those who are unlike us, those who are most likely to find the space of rough play unwelcoming, those with whom we truly lack homonoia. True strangers are those who can offer us grounds for disagreement much stranger than mere contradiction. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/29/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we say when we talk about guns? (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[better gun debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan braman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Kahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Stalemate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people will say that they&#8217;re unnecessary and dangerous. Others will say that they&#8217;re a tool for self-defense and self-sufficiency. That&#8217;s usually where the debate rests, except that the 2nd Amendment privileges the second group. If we want to make progress, we can offer better reasons, reasons that will be superior precisely because they are &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/17/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When we finally start talking about gun control, what should we say?</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing What's Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart Monday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love policy discussions, but the demands for policy discussion on gun control after the shootings in Newtown today are terribly wrong-headed. The problem is that demanding a policy discussion is not the same thing as having a policy discussion. At this point, we&#8217;re just talking about talking about gun control. It&#8217;s all &#8220;mention&#8221; and &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/14/when-we-finally-start-talking-about-gun-control-what-should-we-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
