<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; fiery friendship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/fiery-friendship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coauthorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schliesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiery friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This piece was co-written and co-published with Eric Schliesser. The most dazzling example of co-authorship is Paul Erd&#337;s, who co-wrote more than 1400 papers in mathematics with 485 collaborators. (What is your Erd&#337;s number?) To do this, he became functionally homeless: &#8220;His modus operandi was to show up on the doorstep of a fellow mathematician, &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/07/19/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friendly Fire and Fiery Friendship: Noma Arpaly, Joseph Trullinger, and the Tenor of Philosophy Conversation</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 18:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiery friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gotthold Lessing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Trullinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leigh Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noma Arpaly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too often in praise for "agonism" we tend to treat the conflicts as if they are self-justifying. Trullinger's view is that we ought to endorse the spirit of "glad to be wrong" by being particularly welcoming to those who are unlike us, those who are most likely to find the space of rough play unwelcoming, those with whom we truly lack homonoia. True strangers are those who can offer us grounds for disagreement much stranger than mere contradiction. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/29/friendly-fire-and-fiery-friendship-noma-arpaly-joseph-trullinger-and-the-tenor-of-philosophy-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
