<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>46 favorite reads on democracy, civic tech and a few other interesting things</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[behavioral sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sortition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been exchanging with some friends on a list of favorite reads from 2020. While I started with a short list, it quickly grew: after all, despite the pandemic, there has been lots of interesting stuff published in the &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2021/01/13/46-favorite-reads-on-democracy-civic-tech-and-a-few-other-interesting-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1457369804613-52c61a468e7d?ixlib=rb-1.2.1&#038;ixid=MXwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHw=&#038;auto=format&#038;fit=crop&#038;w=1000&#038;q=80" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Research on Participatory Governance and Tax Compliance</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy councils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue mobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the World Bank, we have published two new studies on the effect of citizen engagement on tax morale and tax compliance. In the first, published last month, we examine the Brazilian case, using data from all 5,570 municipalities in &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2019/06/11/new-research-on-participatory-governance-and-tax-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/bureaucracy_files_tax_consultant_2-1.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catching up (again!) on DemocracySpot</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[change.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICT4D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participatory democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since the last post here. In compensation, it&#8217;s not been a bad year in terms of getting some research out there. First, we finally managed to publish &#8220;Civic Tech in the Global South: Assessing Technology for &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/10/02/catching-up-again-on-democracyspot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/cover-book.png" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/clinton.png" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Papers Published: FixMyStreet and the World’s Largest Participatory Budgeting</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixmystreet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictors of participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are two new published papers that my colleagues Jon Mellon, Fredrik Sjoberg and myself have been working on. The first, The Effect of Bureaucratic Responsiveness on Citizen Participation, published in Public Administration Review, is &#8211; to our knowledge &#8211; &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/03/05/new-papers-published-fixmystreet-and-the-worlds-largest-participatory-budgeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/2016_7_5_anderson-lopes_consulta-popular_virtual.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New IDS Journal – 9 Papers in Open Government</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/27/new-ids-journal-9-papers-in-open-government/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/27/new-ids-journal-9-papers-in-open-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 06:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technlogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICT4D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new IDS Bulletin is out. Edited by Rosemary McGee and Duncan Edwards, this is the first open access version of the well-known journal by the Institute of Development Studies. It brings eight new studies looking at a variety of &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/27/new-ids-journal-9-papers-in-open-government/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/27/new-ids-journal-9-papers-in-open-government/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/01/27/new-ids-journal-9-papers-in-open-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/2016-01-14-16-51-09_resized.jpg?w=839" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/13/world-development-report-2016-digital-dividends/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/13/world-development-report-2016-digital-dividends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empowerment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i-voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICT4D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The World Development Report 2016, the main annual publication of the World Bank, is out. This year&#8217;s theme is Digital Dividends, examining the role of digital technologies in the promotion of development outcomes. The findings of the WDR are simultaneously &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/13/world-development-report-2016-digital-dividends/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="https://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=democracyspot.net&#38;blog=39878169&#38;post=1142&#38;subd=democracyspotdotnet&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1">
 <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2016/01/13/world-development-report-2016-digital-dividends/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/01/13/world-development-report-2016-digital-dividends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/nationalgeographic_1746433-wblive-1.jpg" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/unpacking.png" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Evidence that Citizen Engagement Increases Tax Revenues</title>
		<link>http://democracyspot.net/2015/01/07/new-evidence-that-citizen-engagement-increases-tax-revenues/</link>
		<comments>http://democracyspot.net/2015/01/07/new-evidence-that-citizen-engagement-increases-tax-revenues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decentralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[service delivery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax morale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite a while ago, drawing mainly from the literature on tax morale, I posted about the evidence on the relationship between citizen engagement and tax revenues, in which participatory processes lead to increased tax compliance (as a side note, I&#8217;m &#8230; <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2015/01/07/new-evidence-that-citizen-engagement-increases-tax-revenues/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=democracyspot.net&#38;blog=39878169&#38;post=1081&#38;subd=democracyspotdotnet&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1">
 <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2015/01/07/new-evidence-that-citizen-engagement-increases-tax-revenues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2015/01/07/new-evidence-that-citizen-engagement-increases-tax-revenues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7093/6881485010_da66a9b933_z.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now the paper: Evidence of Social Accountability Initiatives</title>
		<link>http://democracyspot.net/2014/09/24/now-the-paper-evidence-of-social-accountability-initiatives/</link>
		<comments>http://democracyspot.net/2014/09/24/now-the-paper-evidence-of-social-accountability-initiatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 17:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little while ago I wrote about Jonathan Fox&#8217;s work on the evidence of social accountability initiatives. Initially in the format of a PDF slide presentation, it has now been turned into a magnificent paper, the first of the GPSA &#8230; <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/09/24/now-the-paper-evidence-of-social-accountability-initiatives/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=democracyspot.net&#38;blog=39878169&#38;post=1045&#38;subd=democracyspotdotnet&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1">
 <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/09/24/now-the-paper-evidence-of-social-accountability-initiatives/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/09/24/now-the-paper-evidence-of-social-accountability-initiatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/sandwichstrategyfox.png?w=660" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology and Citizen Engagement: Friend or Foe?</title>
		<link>http://democracyspot.net/2014/08/06/technology-and-citizen-engagement-friend-or-foe/</link>
		<comments>http://democracyspot.net/2014/08/06/technology-and-citizen-engagement-friend-or-foe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A/B testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centre for the Study of Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberactivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital participatory budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Involve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictors of participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCTs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Within the open government debate, there is growing interest in the role of technology in citizen engagement. However, as interest in the subject grows, so does the superficiality of the conversations that follow. While the number of citizen engagement and &#8230; <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/08/06/technology-and-citizen-engagement-friend-or-foe/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=democracyspot.net&#38;blog=39878169&#38;post=1014&#38;subd=democracyspotdotnet&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1">
 <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/08/06/technology-and-citizen-engagement-friend-or-foe/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/08/06/technology-and-citizen-engagement-friend-or-foe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/rio_grande_do_sul_participatorybudgeting.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?</title>
		<link>http://democracyspot.net/2014/05/13/social-accountability-what-does-the-evidence-really-say/</link>
		<comments>http://democracyspot.net/2014/05/13/social-accountability-what-does-the-evidence-really-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 11:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Budgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social accountability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what does the evidence about citizen engagement say? Particularly in the development world it is common to say that the evidence is &#8220;mixed&#8221;. It is the type of answer that, even if correct in extremely general terms, does not &#8230; <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/05/13/social-accountability-what-does-the-evidence-really-say/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://pixel.wp.com/b.gif?host=democracyspot.net&#38;blog=39878169&#38;post=985&#38;subd=democracyspotdotnet&#38;ref=&#38;feed=1" width="1" height="1">
 <a href="http://democracyspot.net/2014/05/13/social-accountability-what-does-the-evidence-really-say/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2014/05/13/social-accountability-what-does-the-evidence-really-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://2.gravatar.com/avatar/26d1eac3a722068bb8ffa54bd40b0b2c?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://democracyspotdotnet.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/screenshot-2014-05-11-11-55-52.png?w=450" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
