<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Eric Schliesser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/eric-schliesser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[coauthorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Schliesser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiery friendship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[students]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This piece was co-written and co-published with Eric Schliesser. The most dazzling example of co-authorship is Paul Erd&#337;s, who co-wrote more than 1400 papers in mathematics with 485 collaborators. (What is your Erd&#337;s number?) To do this, he became functionally homeless: &#8220;His modus operandi was to show up on the doorstep of a fellow mathematician, &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span>An Ethical Argument for Philosophy Co-Authorship; on Friendship and Disagreement</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2017/07/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/07/19/an-ethical-argument-for-philosophy-co-authorship-on-friendship-and-disagreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
