<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; epistemic networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/epistemic-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 15:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>important findings about the persuasive power of facts</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a huge body of research that suggests that people are not very susceptible to good arguments. Apparently, we believe things for unexamined reasons, cherry-pick evidence to support our intuitive beliefs, and minimize the significance of inconvenient evidence. These findings contribute to a general skepticism about people&#8217;s capacity for democracy, and I fear that [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/03/20/important-findings-about-the-persuasive-power-of-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cuttings: Ninety-Nine Essays About Happiness</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33215</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33215#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verse and worse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cuttings is a book in progress that consists of 99 essays about the inner life: about suffering, happiness, compassion, and related themes. I first posted each of the essays on this blog, which is 22 years old today and has accumulated more than 2,400 posts. I&#8217;ve selected the contents of Cuttings carefully from this archive, [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33215">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/01/08/cuttings-ninety-nine-essays-about-happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>on defining movements and categorizing people: the case of 68ers</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33302</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33302#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 18:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1968: Radical Protest and its Enemies (HarperCollins, 2018), Richard Vinen describes the ideals and mores of people he calls &#8220;68ers.&#8221; (He discusses the USA, France, Germany, and Britain and acknowledges that he omits Mexico, Czechoslovakia, and other parts of the world where the events of 1968 were probably more consequential.) For him, the 68ers [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33302">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/01/06/on-defining-movements-and-categorizing-people-the-case-of-68ers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>we treat facts and values alike when we reason</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32758</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32758#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 14:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, &#160;Justin McBrayer found this sign&#160;hanging in his son&#8217;s second-grade classroom: Opinion: What someone thinks, feels, or believes. Fact: Something that is true about a subject and can be tested or proven. This distinction is embedded in significant aspects of our culture and society. For example, science aspires to be about facts, not opinions. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32758">we treat facts and values alike when we reason</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32758">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/10/16/we-treat-facts-and-values-alike-when-we-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a collective model of the ethics of AI in higher education</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32435</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32435#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hannah Cox, James Fisher, and I have published a short piece in an outlet called eCampus News. The whole text is here, and I&#8217;ll paste the beginning here: AI is difficult to understand, and its future is even harder to predict. Whenever we face complex and uncertain change, we need mental models to make preliminary [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32435">a collective model of the ethics of AI in higher education</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32435">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/08/29/a-collective-model-of-the-ethics-of-ai-in-higher-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People are not Points in Space</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31652</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31652#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Newly published: Levine, P. (2024). People are not Points in Space: Network Models of Beliefs and Discussions.&#160;Critical Review, 1&#8211;27 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2024.2344994 (Or a free pre-print version) Abstract: Metaphors of positions, spectrums, perspectives, viewpoints, and polarization reflect the same model, which treats beliefs&#8212;and the people who hold them&#8212;as points in space. This model is deeply rooted [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31652">People are not Points in Space</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31652">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/05/23/people-are-not-points-in-space-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Association as a Belief Network and Social Network</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31539</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31539#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 20:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a paper that I presented at the Midwest Political Science Association on April 6, 2024. I hope to reproduce this study with another organization before publishing the results as a comparison. I am open to investigating groups that you may be involved with&#8211;a Rotary Club like the one in this study, a religious [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31539">An Association as a Belief Network and Social Network</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31539">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/05/07/an-association-as-a-belief-network-and-social-network-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Association as a Belief Network and Social Network</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31374</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31374#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I will present a paper entitled &#8220;An Association as a Belief Network and Social Network&#8221; at next week&#8217;s Midwestern Political Science Association meeting (remotely). This is the paper. Abstract: A social network is composed of individuals who may have various relationships with one another. Each member of such a network may hold relevant beliefs and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31374">An Association as a Belief Network and Social Network</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31374">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/03/29/an-association-as-a-belief-network-and-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>people are not points in space</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30755</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30755#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2023 16:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[audio and video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the video of a lecture that I gave at the Institute H21 symposium in Prague last September. The symposium was entitled Democracy in the 21st Century: Challenges for an Open Society, and my talk was: &#8220;People Are Not Points in Space: Opinions and Discussions as Networks of Ideas.&#8221; I&#8217;m grateful for the opportunity [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30755">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2023/11/27/people-are-not-points-in-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>can AI help governments and corporations identify political opponents?</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30332</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30332#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2023 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet and public issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In &#8220;Large Language Model Soft Ideologization via AI-Self-Consciousness,&#8221; Xiaotian Zhou, Qian Wang, Xiaofeng Wang, Haixu Tang, and Xiaozhong Liu use ChatGPT to identify the signature of &#8220;three distinct and influential ideologies: &#8220;&#8217;Trumplism&#8217; (entwined with US politics), &#8216;BLM (Black Lives Matter)&#8217; (a prominent social movement), and &#8216;China-US harmonious co-existence is of great significance&#8217; (propaganda from the [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30332">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2023/10/04/can-ai-help-governments-and-corporations-identify-political-opponents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
