<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; Deliberative Polling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/deliberative-polling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:32:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes</title>
		<link>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816</link>
		<comments>http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 13:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keiva Hummel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community-police relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great for public managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highly recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intergroup relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal of Public Deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Budgeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports & Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ncdd.org/rc/?p=11816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 20-page article,&#160;Taking the Goals of Deliberation Seriously: A Differentiated View on Equality and Equity in Deliberative Designs and Processes&#160;(2016), was written by Edana Beauvais and Andre Baechtiger, and&#160;published in the&#160;Journal of Public Deliberation: Vol. 12: Iss. 2. The article reviews the goals of healthy deliberative systems and the different designs of civic forums, including participant recruitment, nature of interaction, and decision-making.&#160;The authors reviews research which shows evidence that the design of a deliberative system affects its outcomes and goals. Read an excerpt of the [&#8230;] <a href="http://ncdd.org/rc/item/11816">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2017/05/12/taking-the-goals-of-deliberation-seriously-a-differentiated-view-on-equality-and-equity-in-deliberative-designs-and-processes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
