<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; deliberation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/deliberation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 19:40:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>the case for viewpoint diversity</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=35172</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=35172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 17:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio and video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=35172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a quick interview of me for Tufts&#8217; Center for Expanding Viewpoints in Higher Education. I think the question was something like this: &#8220;Why is it important to include diverse points of view?&#8221; Even though I appear to be looking heavenward for answers, I stand by my claim that ethical reasoning is comparative; and [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=35172">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2026/01/28/the-case-for-viewpoint-diversity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>important findings about the persuasive power of facts</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epistemic networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a huge body of research that suggests that people are not very susceptible to good arguments. Apparently, we believe things for unexamined reasons, cherry-pick evidence to support our intuitive beliefs, and minimize the significance of inconvenient evidence. These findings contribute to a general skepticism about people&#8217;s capacity for democracy, and I fear that [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33770">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/03/20/important-findings-about-the-persuasive-power-of-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>listeners, not speakers, are the main reasoners</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32035</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32035#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Robert Brandom offers an influential and respected account of reasoning, which I find intuitive (see Brandom 2000 and other works). At the same time, a large body of psychological research suggests that reasoning&#8211;as he defines it&#8211;is rare. That could be a valid conclusion. Starting with Socrates, philosophers who have proposed various accounts of reason have [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32035">listeners, not speakers, are the main reasoners</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32035">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/07/15/listeners-not-speakers-are-the-main-reasoners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>looking for deliberative moments</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31707</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31707#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2024 16:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not so unusual to enter a discussion without having a firm view of what should be done (perhaps without even having focused on the agenda), to listen and speak for a while, and finally to reach a collective decision that wasn&#8217;t predictable in advance. Before the discussion begins, some of the participants may know [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31707">looking for deliberative moments</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31707">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/05/30/looking-for-deliberative-moments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Vuslat Foundation and Generous Listening</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31243</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31243#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 18:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Vuslat Foundation has opened a public website as generouslistening.org. At the Tisch College of Civic Life, we are one of their partners, as you can tell from the description of a conference that we co-organized and held at Tufts last year (a symposium on &#8220;Generous Listening in Organizations&#8220;); a blog post by my colleague [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31243">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/03/01/the-vuslat-foundation-and-generous-listening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>lessons from the Virginia social studies controversy</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30179</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30179#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advocating civic education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Politico, James Traub offers a deeply reported account of the recent conflict over standards in Virginia, entitled &#8220;Virginia Went to War Over History and Students Actually Came Out on Top.&#8221; Standards are official guidelines about what must be taught in public schools. They may influence enforceable policies, such as which textbooks are purchased and [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=30179">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2023/09/11/lessons-from-the-virginia-social-studies-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How representative is it really? A correspondence on sortition</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2023/08/29/how-representative-is-it-really-a-correspondence-on-sortition/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2023/08/29/how-representative-is-it-really-a-correspondence-on-sortition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citizens&#039; assemblies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersectionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-publics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representativeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sortition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical representation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stratification]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few months ago, Paolo Spada and I published a blog post about sortition and the representativeness of citizens&#8217; assemblies. We were pleasantly surprised by the response to our post and the ensuing discussions. In this new exchange at the &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2023/08/29/how-representative-is-it-really-a-correspondence-on-sortition/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2023/08/29/how-representative-is-it-really-a-correspondence-on-sortition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2023/08/29/how-representative-is-it-really-a-correspondence-on-sortition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b970c8504e1da3a07e2a7d92a7e33676d0c3024743c5230f6346a81c703cd572?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/dylan-nolte-rssqjpezn6o-unsplash.jpg" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reflections on the representativeness of citizens’ assemblies and similar innovations</title>
		<link>https://democracyspot.net/2023/02/22/reflections-on-the-representativeness-of-citizens-assemblies-and-similar-innovations/</link>
		<comments>https://democracyspot.net/2023/02/22/reflections-on-the-representativeness-of-citizens-assemblies-and-similar-innovations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2023 06:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Peixoto]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[citizens&#039; assemblies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collective intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deliberative Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliberative polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-publics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representativeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sortition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://democracyspot.net/?p=1589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Co-authored with Paolo Spada) Introduction For proponents of deliberative democracy, the last couple of years could not have been better. Propelled by the recent diffusion of citizens&#8217; assemblies, deliberative democracy has definitely gained popularity beyond small circles of scholars and &#8230; <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2023/02/22/reflections-on-the-representativeness-of-citizens-assemblies-and-similar-innovations/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a> <a href="https://democracyspot.net/2023/02/22/reflections-on-the-representativeness-of-citizens-assemblies-and-similar-innovations/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2023/02/22/reflections-on-the-representativeness-of-citizens-assemblies-and-similar-innovations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="https://2.gravatar.com/avatar/b970c8504e1da3a07e2a7d92a7e33676d0c3024743c5230f6346a81c703cd572?s=96&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://democracyspot.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/diversitypic.webp" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/0Z1nR_4Yz6Yc1MXSQrA9A9MS9T4C75gfSkLeDwgNxdy5G2gV16NB4Yxni9kpflM9FnXfPZMabEgV8CdP17ypdAEDA1g6WTH1O2oI_984nJwadM9PBV594dUqy1Vl8IhqGSyPbl0wwH-gOPPR9SkqgLI" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/1UKdJQMcKLLy3hxp_4GVvMChpPgkeROk9ivcOgG8YRORsUbqKCKxJ9omfBcK6rP66MMcqKoou7jE1TP4j6UqrDy5VMYtbovg3qRcVBGsz0Fjr1CRfxvJmQw20-okfdlKY7JyZhtIifCp4qxoWxVGZDk" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>using federal spending to strengthen democracy</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28027</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28027#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revitalizing the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal government is authorized to spend an additional $2 trillion over the next 10 years through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law,&#160;the CHIPS and Science Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act. I support many of the priorities in these laws. But government spending should be democratic&#8211;at several levels. Operating in a democratic way is consistent with [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28027">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2022/12/15/using-federal-spending-to-strengthen-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>assigning students to write cases</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28031</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28031#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2022 17:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[deliberation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think of a &#8220;teaching case&#8221; as a true story that culminates in a difficult decision that has confronted an individual or group. The decision is typically difficult because of conflicting values, incomplete information, and unpredictable outcomes. A teaching case is useful as a prompt for discussion and to teach the disposition of acting wisely [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=28031">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2022/12/08/assigning-students-to-write-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
