<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; cultural cognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/cultural-cognition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Why Daniel Levine is Wrong About Everything</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2013/01/why-daniel-levine-is-wrong-about-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2013/01/why-daniel-levine-is-wrong-about-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radley Balko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Update Wrongzo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, he&#8217;s not. But that&#8217;s the title of his new blog. (Apparently he is challenging me for the title of &#8220;Most Contrite Fallibilist.&#8221; He&#8217;s even taken&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2013/01/why-daniel-levine-is-wrong-about-everything/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2013/01/06/why-daniel-levine-is-wrong-about-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we say when we talk about guns? (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[better gun debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig Whitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan braman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Kahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friendly Fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Stalemate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status and Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Self-Defeating Victory of Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people will say that they&#8217;re unnecessary and dangerous. Others will say that they&#8217;re a tool for self-defense and self-sufficiency. That&#8217;s usually where the debate rests, except that the 2nd Amendment privileges the second group. If we want to make progress, we can offer better reasons, reasons that will be superior precisely because they are &#8230; &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span>&#8594;</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/17/what-should-we-say-when-we-talk-about-guns-continued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cultural Cognition is Not a Bias</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/cultural-cognition-is-not-a-bias/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/cultural-cognition-is-not-a-bias/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Believing What's True]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biases and heuristics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Kahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doing What's Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemic Institutional Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HPV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judging with Your Gut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[That There May Be Any Future At all]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=3005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some recent posts by&#160;Dan Kahan&#160;on the subject of &#8220;cultural cognition&#8221; deserve attention: (Cultural cognition refers to the tendency of individuals to conform their beliefs about disputed matters of fact (e.g., whether global warming is a serious threat; whether the death penalty deters murder; whether gun control makes society more safe or less) to values that define their cultural identities.) Nullius in verba? Surely you are joking, Mr. Hooke! (or Why cultural cognition is not a bias, part&#160;1) There&#8217;s no remotely plausible account of human rationality&#8212;of our ability to accumulate genuine knowledge about how the world works&#8212;that doesn&#8217;t treat as central individuals&#8217; amazing capacity to reliably identify and put themselves in intimate contact with others who can transmit to them what is known collectively as&#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2012/12/cultural-cognition-is-not-a-bias/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2012/12/09/cultural-cognition-is-not-a-bias/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
