<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; cosmopolitan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/cosmopolitan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Any Cook Can Govern: Populism and Progressivism</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/12/any-cook-can-govern-populism-and-progressivism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/12/any-cook-can-govern-populism-and-progressivism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anti-elitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-intellectualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonio Gramsci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLR James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JCI Scholars Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[populism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prisoners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rousseau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spelling Bees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have lots of feels and lots of arguments about these two pieces by Peter Levine on an alt-left populism: &#8220;pluralist populism&#8221; and &#8220;separating populism from anti-intellectualism.&#8221; (This post on identity politics is also relevant.) Peter even goes so far as to call himself a populist, which is a surprising move to restore the term&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/12/any-cook-can-govern-populism-and-progressivism/">Continue reading <span>Any Cook Can Govern: Populism and Progressivism</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/12/any-cook-can-govern-populism-and-progressivism/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/12/12/any-cook-can-govern-populism-and-progressivism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity, Equality, and Realignment</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-past-the-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the political participation of disaffected, unrepresented voters drops, this reserve army of the unallied gets bigger. It's especially potent in primaries, which are very low turnout events. My suspicion is that if disaffected voters could be reliably re-engaged, the parties would likely find wedge issues to divvy them up over a relatively short set of elections. But they may well divvy them up differently than the parties had previously done. This would be the seed of a realignment. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/02/diversity-equality-and-realignment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
