<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Civic Variations on the Fact, Value, Strategy Distinction</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/civic-variations-of-the-fact-value-strategy-distinction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/civic-variations-of-the-fact-value-strategy-distinction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 17:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civic studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neoliberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter levine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SWOT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technocratic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When civic studies scholars write about civics and citizens, as Peter Levine does today, we will usually mention the following trinity: facts, values, and strategies. Here&#8217;s Levine: The citizen is committed to affecting the world. Some important phenomena&#160;may be beyond her grasp, so that she sees them but sees no way of changing them. But &#8230; <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/civic-variations-of-the-fact-value-strategy-distinction/">Continue reading <span>Civic Variations on the Fact, Value, Strategy Distinction</span></a>
 <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/civic-variations-of-the-fact-value-strategy-distinction/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/06/civic-variations-on-the-fact-value-strategy-distinction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diversity, Equality, and Realignment</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2016 12:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshua Miller]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-past-the-post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/?p=5076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the political participation of disaffected, unrepresented voters drops, this reserve army of the unallied gets bigger. It's especially potent in primaries, which are very low turnout events. My suspicion is that if disaffected voters could be reliably re-engaged, the parties would likely find wedge issues to divvy them up over a relatively short set of elections. But they may well divvy them up differently than the parties had previously done. This would be the seed of a realignment. <a href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2016/06/diversity-equality-and-realignment/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2016/06/02/diversity-equality-and-realignment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
