<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Civic Studies &#187; 2024 election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civicstudies.org/category/2024-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civicstudies.org</link>
	<description>An intellectual community of researchers and practitioners dedicated to building the emerging field of civic studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>reaching the opt-outs</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33950</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33950#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revitalizing the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s New York Times, Rob Flaherty, who was Kamala Harris&#8217; deputy campaign manager, argues that Democrats lose &#8220;opt-out voters,&#8221; people who distrust all politicians and all traditional media and who obtain their politically relevant information from other sources, such as online influencers or real-life contacts who follow the influencers. These &#8220;opt-outs&#8221; may start out [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33950">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/04/28/reaching-the-opt-outs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CIRCLE report: How Does Gen Z Really Feel about Democracy?</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33873</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33873#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 18:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My colleagues at CIRCLE have issued a report with Protect Democracy that is based on a nationally representative sample of citizens between 18 and 29 that they conducted soon after last fall&#8217;s election.* At the heart of the study is a categorization of young American citizens into three groups. In the words of the report, [&#8230;] <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33873">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2025/04/09/circle-report-how-does-gen-z-really-feel-about-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where have lower-educated voters moved right? (a look at 102 countries over 35 years)</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33068</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33068#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2024 15:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic reform overseas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe that left parties should draw their votes from lower on the socio-economic hierarchy, so that they can compete by offering more governmental support. Right parties should draw their votes from the upper end, so that they can compete by promising economic growth. This debate and competition is healthy. In contrast, when left parties [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33068">Where have lower-educated voters moved right? (a look at 102 countries over 35 years)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=33068">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/11/30/where-have-lower-educated-voters-moved-right-a-look-at-102-countries-over-35-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>complexity and nuance about public opinion</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32854</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32854#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2024 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio and video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last Monday, I gave a talk at Colgate University. I claimed that if you read a lot of mainstream survey research, you&#8217;re likely to conclude that &#8220;people are stupid and they hate each other,&#8221; but this negative assessment reflects some bias. A student, Colgate senior Clementina Aboagye, told Maddie Koger of the Colgate Maroon-News: &#8220;I [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32854">complexity and nuance about public opinion</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32854">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/11/12/complexity-and-nuance-about-public-opinion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>social class and the youth vote in 2024</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32949</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32949#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revitalizing the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My colleagues at CIRCLE (The Center for Information &#38; Research on Civic Learning &#38; Engagement) have already produced an incredible body of analysis of the 2024 youth vote. Overall, they find that youth turnout was higher than in past decades but lower than in 2020, and young adults supported the Democrats, but much more narrowly [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32949">social class and the youth vote in 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32949">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/11/11/social-class-and-the-youth-vote-in-2024/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>explaining a past election versus deciding what to do next</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32895</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32895#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Internet is saturated with explanations of the 2024 election. Some of these &#8220;quick takes&#8221; are dispassionate, while others take the form: If only Harris had done what I know is right, she would have won. The challenge is epistemic: it&#8217;s virtually impossible to explain a single past event that involves many decision-makers (in this [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32895">explaining a past election versus deciding what to do next</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32895">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/11/08/explaining-a-past-election-versus-deciding-what-to-do-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>strategizing for civil resistance in defense of democracy</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31978</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31978#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 16:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In July, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts&#160;said,&#160;&#8220;We are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless, if the left allows it to be.&#8221; His statement reflected some bluster and hype, and Trump distanced himself from Heritage. Nevertheless, Roberts expressed a mood that will be shared by many&#8211;perhaps more than 1,000&#8211;new White [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31978">strategizing for civil resistance in defense of democracy</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=31978">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/11/06/strategizing-for-civil-resistance-in-defense-of-democracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a constitutional crisis is not the end of history</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32817</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32817#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 18:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In Forbes yesterday, Meg Little Reilly paraphrases and quotes me: American students are generally taught that the U.S. Constitution is unbreakable &#8212; which has been true, thus far&#8212;but this narrative reinforces the notion that if the Constitution were to fall, so too would the nation. For many Americans, everything that comes after political unrest is [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32817">a constitutional crisis is not the end of history</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32817">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/10/29/a-constitutional-crisis-is-not-the-end-of-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>what voters are hearing about in the 2024 election</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32652</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32652#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy to imagine that our fellow citizens see the same political news that we do, and yet many of them draw the opposite conclusions about the candidates. But this impression is only partly true. To a significant extent, prospective voters are seeing and hearing different things, depending on their parties and demographic groups. Specifically, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32652">what voters are hearing about in the 2024 election</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32652">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/10/25/what-voters-are-hearing-about-in-the-2024-election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>why “liberal” can sound like “upper-class”</title>
		<link>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32265</link>
		<comments>https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2024 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revitalizing the left]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an article reporting The New York Times&#8216; recent battleground state polls, Lisa Lerer&#160;and&#160;Ruth Igielnik quote Jonathan Ball, a Michigan floor-installer: [He] said he believed Mr. Trump would do more to help working Americans than Ms. Harris. &#8220;I think she&#8217;s more liberal. I just don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s all for the middle class,&#8221; said Mr. Ball, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32265">why &#8220;liberal&#8221; can sound like &#8220;upper-class&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/">Peter Levine</a>.</p> <a href="https://peterlevine.ws/?p=32265">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://civicstudies.org/2024/08/13/why-liberal-can-sound-like-upper-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
